n80
Yes, you've put your finger on the problem here. "negative" results are never counted - the relevance is only ever dismissed. If you ever fail hearing a difference it can only be your fault, or the fault of whatever test you conduct. If you acknowledge your own fallibility, and the general fallibility of humans in this regard, you are dogmatic. It's NEVER that the subjective results of the audiophile could be wrong.
And remember...they are the "open minded" ones ;-)
That struck me as funny. Sounds like something from a Monty Python skit. "If she floats she is a witch and we will burn her. If she sinks and drowns she's not a witch."
So if I hear a difference then you cable guys are right. If I don't hear a difference then I'm just one of those guys without discriminating perception (a very real possibility I'll admit). The scenario doesn't seem to allow for the possibility that I AM a discriminating hearer and don't hear a difference because the cables simply don't make a difference OR the scenario where I hear a difference but that difference is a product of my perception bias, which unlike some folks I KNOW that I experience from time to time.
Yes, you've put your finger on the problem here. "negative" results are never counted - the relevance is only ever dismissed. If you ever fail hearing a difference it can only be your fault, or the fault of whatever test you conduct. If you acknowledge your own fallibility, and the general fallibility of humans in this regard, you are dogmatic. It's NEVER that the subjective results of the audiophile could be wrong.
And remember...they are the "open minded" ones ;-)