Personally, I think it is because piano live is amazing but it is difficult to reproduce well, so most systems would fall short. I have learned that over the years about horns. I tend to agree with you though. A good sample of test songs should include horns and piano to test a system’s ability to enjoyably reproduce those instruments. I don’t listen much to piano, just not my thing, but have really started to enjoy horns - feels odd to even type that because when I first started my system made horn sound terrible.
Why not the piano as a reference for bass
I see a lot of commentary/reviews on a systems bass response that all seem to hinge on the 41 hz double bass and such range. At 27.5 the A0 note on a piano seems a better point to judge. Lots of piano in normal music vs say an organ note. I know when I feel that deep chord played it is one of things I enjoy about listening the most! Was listening to Wish you were here live and the piano was sublime.
So is it more of how much musical energy is perceived in the 40 hz range or what that makes this more of a reproduction benchmark?
I welcome your input!
New Joe Bonamassa out BTW!
- ...
- 86 posts total
- 86 posts total