Dear Thuchan: +++++ " Don't get me wrong I am an afficinado of vintage designs, especially on the TT, tonearm and cartridge field. " +++++
don't get me wrong but maybe you are an afficionado on electronic amplifier designs too.
I'm not a proffesional one either but not a rockie here. I know in deep every single circuit stage on my 20.6s that were modified where it needs. I know too several today amplifier designs and IMHO, as you said it, have different approaches but not necessary with better quality performance level than my modified 20.6s.
Thuchan, take a good/top electronic design and with the knowledge/skills need it modify it and you could achieve not only a simple up-grade but something you can't imagine.
I can go in deep talking on the subject and talking on my 20.6s but I think is useless other than say:today are very competitive to any other amp out there and a real challenge for many others like your Wavacs.
+++++ " No need to discuss the MM/MC topic here cause the main focus is on MMs. " +++++
No, it's fine to do it , what I'm refering is to discuss in specific FR in your system because then I have to " dissect " very carefully your audio system to relate your cartridge findings and I don't think the thread is good for that.
Through the thread we discussed time to time the MM/MI alternative against the LOMC one, nothing wrong with that. Nothing is perfect and both alternatives have its own advantages and disadvantages even with some of us both share its performance in our audio systems at the same time.
I always say that trade-offs are a main subject on audio quality performance level. Our each one accepted trade-offs are the ones that determine/define what we are hearing.
Yes, today my accepted trade-offs are oriented to the MM/MI alternative till a new LOMC one or other alternative came here and tell me: " I'm way better alternative ".
Any one ( like you ) has the right to " live in the error/mistake ", Ja Ja Ja.
Regards and enjoy the music, Raul. |
Raul, the stock Atma MP-1 phono preamp is all-tube with cascoded 12AT7s at input. Lewm creatively adapted the MAT02 hybrid input stage from an Allen Wright phono stage schematic. RIP AW. |
Dear Raul,
those old ML Mono blocks were really good designs some 25 years ago. Today you'll find several different approaches and IMHO better sounding amps. But if you are happy with them it is fine. Don't get me wrong I am an afficinado of vintage designs, especially on the TT, tonearm and cartridge field.
No need to discuss the MM/MC topic here cause the main focus is on MMs. Agree! You did such a deep survey of almost every vintage MMs and also some new designs. Hopefully there will be no natural end of the crest. This will become the first thread on Audiogon with over 5000 inputs. Incredible!
best & fun only - Thuchan |
Btw, I was unaware that Atmasphere is an hybrid design. I always thinked was full tube design.
Raul. |
Dear Dgarretson: Well I think you are talking on the " venerable " AD MAT02 transistors.
What a coincidence, my 20.6 Levinson monobloks works around those devices at its input stage. I think it came from the very first model of those amplifiers: the 20's ( 1985. ) that latter on were the 20.5s till the 20.6s that I own. Btw, great audio designed products.
Regards and enjoy the music, Raul. |
Hi Raul, Unfortunately I don't. I'm hoping to try one, but first need to get back on track with repair or replacement of my low-gain phono stage.
Lew, Allen Wright once mentioned that a low-impedance cartridge is less noisy into the MAT02 cascode. This has also been my experience. There is a similar remark in the application notes section on the last page of the MAT02 data sheet. |
Dear Dgarretson: Do you own the MMC1/2 B&O cartridge?
Regards and enjoy the music, Raul. |
Dave, I've only used it so far with the Stanton 980LZS, which is low-ish impedance. Actually, the input stage of the MP1 is a dual-differential cascode in its totality, as you know. Cascodes have high input impedance (I think) notwithstanding the fact that in our cases the lower device is a transistor. I will have to look up the math, but the input Z may be high, certainly higher than that afforded by a typical 47K or 100K load resistor seen in parallel. In fact, are you sure the MAT02 even by itself has a low impedance at its gate? Gotta check it. |
Hi Lewm and Raul, my observation was strickly about the high background noise level that I experienced with a high-impedance MM/MI cartridge driving MAT02 transistors at phono input in the bottom of a hybrid cascode. Lewm, please post your results in this regard with MMC1. |
Dear Lewm: Good. Yes, I love the Acutex and the MMC1 is just: amazing!. Have fun.
Regards and enjoy the music, Raul. |
"Of course that Lewm could try in his MP-1 but I'm with you about." Dave's view was that the load resistor on my MP1 input might be too low in value to suit the MMC1. If you noticed, I responded by saying I have switchable input resistors, 100R, 1000R, 47K (may change the latter to 100K). So that's not a problem. I also have two levels of gain available in the MP1; the low gain setting would probably work fine with the MMC1. I do also have an entirely separate phono stage for really high output MMs. However, I think the output of the MMC1 will be too low to drive the MM section of that phono stage. (Silvaweld SWH-550 just replaced the Ayre P5Xe for that use. The Silvaweld is amazingly good, but you might not like it, because it uses only tubes, including even a tube rectifier. It does also have a pair of MC inputs which surely would be capable of working with the MMC1.)
To me, the big advantage of solid state vs tubes in a phono section, lots of gain with low noise, is negated by using MM/MI cartridges, except for the really low output ones.
Meantime, listening to Ella Fitzgerald sing Harold Arlen via the Acutex driving the Silvaweld makes me think that you are quite correct, Raul. We don't need no stinkin' MC cartridges. |
Dear Dgarretson: +++++ " The 980LZS has a nice low impedance to complement a MC phono stage. " +++++
yes, that was designed to be runned in a MC stage. The B&O MI was a totally different design that needs a specific MM phono stage as any other MM/MI cartridge.
Of course that Lewm could try in his MP-1 but I'm with you about.
Regards and enjoy the music, Raul. |
Dear Thuchan: Me either. Please excuse me not to give you an answer about those FR cartridges, not in this thread but I understand your " take " there.
regards and enjoy the music, Raul. |
Dear Nandric: IMHO this german cartridge repair source is a welcome " discover " for some of us that need that kind of help.
Price?, that's up to you. Profits?: well no one works for " free ".
Regards and enjoy the music, Raul. |
Dear Raul, My assumption is that you don't speak German so my intention was to add some info that I got from the site you provided. To me it is obvious that Alex buy corpuses of both : AKG and B&O. He then provide them with styli of his own making and resell them. I never looked at B&O carts on the German ebay but well the AKG. The AKG P 8 ES Super Nova one can get for, say, 10 Euro without stylus. Idem the AKG 25 MD. I own 3 Super Nova and 2 of 25 MD. All of them without styli. I bought them because they were so cheap. But 200 Euro for one aftermarket stylus I don't regard as cheap. BTW there are often the AKG's with original stylus on the German ebay for less money. So, it seems to me, even in Germany one is profiting from your thread.
Regards, |
Dear Travbrow/friends: If you read the main page on this thread you will find that I prefer the B&O originals over the hi-fi like SS ones. My statement on that subject was way before this B&O oficial review about.
I own both carrtridges on this review and are similar on performance, the 20 was a substitute for the 5000:
+++++++ """ As promised, here is an independent review of the two competitors for your attention when looking for a new cartridge.
The rivals are an SMMC20EN from Soundsmith against an MMC5000 which has new suspension and stylus with a Shibata diamond from Axel. The SMMC20EN costs $279.95 at time of writing (June 2009) and you will need to factor in shipping and customs if in Europe. Prices start at $149.95 and go up to $1599.95.
A re-tipped 5000 with an original Shibata stylus as reviewed here will cost €265, which is the most expensive option offered. Prices start from €89 and work their way up.
As a test I’ve auditioned the Soundsmith SMMC20EN along side a rebuilt MMC5000 from Axel Schurholz. The MMC20 style of pickup can be used in a wide range of B&O’s better turntables, highlights being the Beogram 1700, the Beocenter 1800 and the Beogram 8000 of the Beolab 8000 system. It is the latter setup that was used for these listening tests, the stable nature of the turntable mechanism and the clean, insightful nature of the phono stage in the amplifier make together a very useful analytical tool as well as a fine audio system.
Starting with the MMC5000, it was clear that the characteristic B&O sound, that is smooth, relaxed, pleasant and highly detailed, was there in full measure. Tracking force was determined by the use of a test record rather than relying on the maker’s basic figures; this is the most accurate method and is the only way to extract maximum performance. The optimum setting for the MMC5000 was found to be 1.4 grams, a figure close to that recommended for the original. What was particularly impressive was the wide and deep soundstage that the rebuilt MMC5000 was able to construct, instruments and voices could be instantly placed with unerring precision, this, combined with the alluring tonal balance made for a highly enjoyable listening experience that encouraged the detailed re-exploration of familiar recordings. If one had to be critical it could be said that the focus of the MMC5000 was a little soft, the detail was certainly there but to appreciate it fully it was necessary to settle into the performance and pay careful attention to the most delicate of sounds.
The pickup itself was well finished and apart from some small traces of glue visible around the clear plastic stylus guard showed no signs of having been dismantled.
Moving onto the Soundsmith it was immediately obvious that the two pickups were very different in character. The SMMC20EN appears to have been retuned for the digital age, gone is the smoothness and niceness and in it’s place is a sharper, more aggressively detailed sound that is more akin to that of a CD player than a classic turntable. The SMMC20EN required slightly less down force (1.3 grams) to track correctly but because of its brighter sound the limits of the LP system were more audible, it was never sibilant but it certainly verged on it at times. Some recordings were also overlaid with a steely glare that could very occasionally blur the imaging.
Whilst the SMMC20EN is undoubtedly a competent piece of equipment its appearance leaves much to be desired. The original B&O pickups are styled to precisely match the arms that they fit into but the plastic over body of the SMMC20EN is too big and slightly the wrong shape so it never looks quite right. On the Beogram 8000 this wasn’t too much of a problem as the arm is concealed most of the time and the dust cover is heavily tinted but on more exposed models such as the 4000 range the appearance would offend the connoisseur’s eye. Soundsmith must be congratulated however on tooling up to produce their MMC range, it has saved many a Beogram from disuse.
To summarise, the choice of pickup depends on what you want it for. If you have an immaculately restored system from which you want authentic appearance and the distinctive “B&O sound” then the reconditioning service offered by Axel is something that requires further investigation. If on the other hand your musical tastes require a harder edge than B&O typically caters for and you can live with the looks then the Soundsmith is an excellent product which will bring you a lot of pleasure. """" +++++++++
well, as you can read that not only confirm my findings on the SS " signature " ( same signature with its Strain Gauge one. ) against the original ones but speakls on better " build " quality from Axel.
IMHO if a B&O owner is satisfied with the cartridge quality performance he owns then Axel is the answer. If you want a different cartridge then SS is the road but here you will have a non B&O original quality performance level. So as the review stated: is up to your own priorities on quality performance.
For me Axel is my " ticket " and right now I'm sending to him a 6000 and three AKGs for refresh.
Regards and enjoy the music, Raul. |
Dear Nandric: This German ( Axel ) cartridge repair source is as SS an authorized B&O service center.
There are only two oficial authorized B&O cartridge service centers: SS and that one in Germany.
IMHO maybe is time to try with this German source instead SS not only because the SS delay repair time but because of quality too. More on this latter.
Regards and enjoy the music, Raul. |
Dear friends: Axel Schurholz told me that he can repair any MC or MM/MI cartridge. IMHO seems to me that a good alternative for some of us:
www.schallplattennadeln.de
info@schallplattennadeln.de
Regards and enjoy the music, Raul. |
Dear Dgob: I think that could be interesting for you ask Axel if he can help you to fix your Technics P100CMK4:
info@schallplattennadeln.de
Regards and enjoy the music, Raul. |
Dear Dgarretson/Lewm: The B&O MMC1/2 DC resistance is 750 ohms.
Regards and enjoy the music, Raul. |
Says Thuchan: +++ No - there is no sex after marriage. +++ Such a comforting thought (to some of us...?) And Raul, Dear Thuchan: +++++ "we should also keep in mind that for three overprized cheap vintages... +++
Oh hell? So just go easy on the diamonds? I do say that sucks, but then there you go. Can't have it all as we know --- (eventually). Enjoy the music never the less, Axelle :-) |
Dear Raul,
as you know I am not addicted and also not dependent on any audio church. When I am exploring into a new field I do it with enthusiasm and on my own experience in my room which provides plenty of experimentation lines available.
Regarding the MMs I made a discovery at the weekend. when testing a FR-6SE I realized that this cart coming in a pretty good condition produces a very nice open sound, good for voices and small jazz combos. When I put a FR-7f in the same line - via the same Phono Pre (EMT JPA 66) - I do hear a difference.
What do you think the difference is? Yes, the punch is greater, the pressure in a very comfortable way is more direct - maybe thanks to the Bavarian Voice. What do you think?
best & fun only - Thuchan |
Dear Raul, The AKG styli from Schallplattennadeln are not original but from their own making. The same apply for the B&O styli and carts. Thy buy B&O carts themself, repair them if needed and resell them. I think that Americans should first try Sound Smith as Lew suggested.
Regards, |
Dear Raul, Within the US, isn't Sound Smith also an authorized repair service for B&O? Plus do they not manufacture cartridges sold under the B&O name, if there are any? |
Dear friends: This is to all the B&O community interested on a different source ( from SS one. ) for B&O repair cartridges:
++++ " Recently Axel Schurholz (www.schallplattennadeln.de) in Germany has added to the choices available by offering a reconditioning service for worn or broken B&O MMC pickups. Obviously this requires that the customer provides an exchange unit but once this condition has been met the pickup can be rebuilt to any one of a wide choice of specifications, regardless of the original grade of the worn unit. " +++++
this comes direct from B&O. Axel is an oficial/authorized B&O cartridge service center.
From here I can say that that last link was for repair cartridges.
Regards and enjoy the music, Raul. |
I'm not sure if in the last link the price is only for stylus repair/fix or for the AKG cartridge with a fixed and new stylus made by them.
Sorry but no english in that site. Anyway IMHO is a good news for that persons interested on AKG cartridges (??) or a source for fix their AKG ones.
Raul. |
Dear friends: Your choice:
http://www.schallplattennadeln.de/AKG/AKG-System-mit-Nadel/
Regards and enjoy the music, Raul. |
Dear Thuchan: +++++ " we should also keep in mind that for three overprized cheap vintage MMs you can get a very nice MC?" +++++
that makes no sense to me. Maybe because you are a little " newcomer " to the MM/MI analog source alternative, let me to ask/explain about:
Why anyone could choose that " very nice MC " option ( I don't know in what range price is that " very nice MC option ". ) against one, not three as you posted: it does not needs three, " overprized cheap vintage MM/MIs " that outperforms that " very nice MC " for 1/10 the money you have to pay for the LOMC one?
That makes sense to you?
Regards and enjoy the music, Raul. |
Dear Siniy123: The B&O MMC1 and MMC2 is a similar case as the AT-15SS and 20SS: hand selected for the MMC1 and 20SS.
Here is what the B&O people said on the subject:
+++++ " The MMC1 and MMC2 were essentially the same cartridge with the MMC1 using the best specified diamond tips. " +++++
that's why the channel separation in both, B&O and AT, top of the line cartridges is a little better but all these cartridges ( in its own line. ) performs similar.
Regards and enjoy the music, Raul. |
Dear Kravi4ka: If I remember you own the Lustre GST-801 that due that it is a removable headshell design can works with those MM/MI cartridges using different headshells.
Seems to me that you could not need an specific tonearm for that and instead to invest on tonearm plus the MMC4 or 20EN + the Nagaoka: if I was you I will go at once for the MMC2, why not?, blow away all the other ones you name it and maybe every one you own.
regards and enjoy the music, Raul. |
Dear Thuchan, When I contemplate what my poor wife has to put up with, I cannot wonder at the condition of post-marital sex. |
Dear Raul and Dave, (1) The Reed tonearm and the MP1 phono inputs are within physical reach of each other using 3-ft interconnects, which is why I linked use of the Reed to use of the MP1. Plus the Reed has XLR connectors and the MP1 has XLR inputs. (2) I have set up my MP1 with switchable gain ("low" gain is good for cartridges with output between ~0.6 and ~1.5mV; "high" gain can handle any cartridge with output less than 0.5mV) and with switchable 47K, 1000R, and 100R cartridge loading. So if I set MP1 to low gain and 47K, should be fine with B&O.
Yes, Dave, I can run the 980LZS into 1000R; sounds very very good. |
Dear Lewm, I am so sorry for you cause you had to wait for the answer such a long time.
No - there is no sex after marriage.
I hope you did not went into an adventure without sex- you know people in the best ages regard the best sex as a wonderful dinner after or before a wonderful audio session.
any questions?
best & fun only - Thuchan |
Lew, the MMC1's medium-low output may work well with your modified MP-1 phono stage. However if the cartridge's DC resistance is in the hundreds of ohms as is typical of most MM/MI,you will likely experience high background noise level and lackluster dynamics. (I am unable to find an impedance spec for the B&O on the net.) This was my experience running a high-impedance low-output MM into my nearly identically modified MP-1. The 980LZS has a nice low impedance to complement a MC phono stage. |
Dear Lewm: I'm not 100% sure but I think is 15grs with out headshell. Taking this value my B&O set up resonate at around 5hz and performs just splendid.
If the Reed tonearm could handle the very low cartridge/adaptor weight then you have to try it, seems to me a good option.
About it's output gain yes it is lower than other MM/MI cartridges but nothing near a LOMC or near to the 980LZS but you can try with the lower gain your Atma's can.
+++++ " which means the MMC1 could ride in my Reed tonearm with 14g .. " +++++
maybe I loose something here but what is the relationship between the gain in your phono stage and the Reed tonearm? why are related?, makes no sense to me but certainly that if you posted then there is something there.
Btw, be extremely care when you handle that tiny MMC1, especially when you clean the cartridge pin connectors and when you use the stylus guard. All is so tiny that is very easy, with out care, to have an " accident ".
Regards and enjoy the music, Raul. |
Dear Travbrow: The stand alone Technics 100CMK4 or MK3 are cartridges that today that we know the clear importance of a matched headshell to the cartridge along the quality of the headshell wires deserve really this.
In the old times Technics as other cartridge manufacturers, for good reasons, designed the integrated headshell cartridges not only as a more " user friendly " device but with the resources on those times they surrounded the cartridges with what they thinked were the best for it, but that was 30+ years ago and IMHO today there are a way better " road " to make things and to mate those cartridges. There is no contest between a good stand alone cartridge set up and its counterpart headshell integrated. This one is not only limited by the integrated headshell but for the old internal wires.
About that combinations with the EPAs and the integrated 100CMK4 my take is the same: nothing beat the stand alone ones. Btw, ( could be ) but I don't think that the integrated headshell Technics that weights around 19grs be the best match for the low mass EPA MK2, anyway IMHO the stand alone is the way to go.
I think that you save money and time not buying the Technics integrated headshell ones: not worth to have it and now that we have those beautiful B&O MMC1 and MMC2: why do you need those Technics?. Btw, these B&O looks like a very good match for your MK2 tonearm.
About the SS " upgraded " models IMHO these ones even that are good performers ( I heard the SMMC1 and 2. ) does not match the " perfection " on the original ones. Several B&O owners that own or owned both options vote for the SS ones and I understand why: hi-fi sound especially on the high frequency range, the originals IMHO are truer to the real thing.
If you can I urge you to get one of those B&O babies: 1.6grs and running!!!!!, incredible.
Regards and enjoy the music, Raul. |
Raul, What is the effective mass of your Grace tonearm? Due to the relatively low output of the MMC1, I will want to feed its output directly into the MC stage of my Atma-sphere MP1, as I do for the Stanton 980LZS, which means the MMC1 could ride in my Reed tonearm with 14g effective mass. (Probably also the adapter adds a gram or two.) On paper, that's not the best match for a cartridge with a compliance of 30, but.... |
I owned the MMC2 and it does require elevated gain levels to fully appreciate its qualities. It provides excellent detail and a stable soundstage and imaging. A neutral and accurate performer is how I recall it: in my particular set up.
I sold mine (as with so many other gems!) under the influence of my Technics EPC 100 Mk4. Definitely worth a listen especially for those not yet convinced about the reputed limitations of most MC's. |
Dear Timeltel, My Irish friend tells me that an Irish seven course dinner consists of a 6-pack of beer and a potato.
So the MMC20CL will not work in the MMC1 adapter? Too bad. |
Hi Raul, thanks for mentioning you tried the Technics integrated headshell 100CMKIII. I thought of buying one already but the price was very high for a used sample. I didn't know the integrated headshell degraded the performance.
I wonder how the Technics integrated headshell models sound with the Technics EPA 100MKI or MKII tonearms? I thought the Technics EPA 100MKII tonearm and integrated headshell 100CMKIV was said to be a hard to beat combination?
What about the "upgraded" Soundsmith B & O based cartidges, are they even better than the original MMC1 and MMC2 models? According to your praise of the original B & O models it would be very hard to improve the original design. |
Dear Siniy123: Yes, you are right:
MMC1
Description: Nude multi-radial Contact Line diamond, mounted on a sapphire cantilever
Tracking force - grams: 1
Diamond Stylus: Cont. line nude
Cantilever tube: Sapphire
Effective tip mass mg: 0,25
Compliance mg/mN: 30
Frequency 20-20000 Hz=/-dB: 1
Channel separation 1000>dB: 30
Output mV/cm/s RMS: 0,6
Cartridge weight gram: 1,6
MMC2
Description: Nude multi-radial Contact Line diamond, mounted on a sapphire cantilever
Tracking force - grams: 1
Diamond Stylus: Cont. line nude
Cantilever tube: Sapphire
Effective tip mass mg: 0,3
Compliance mg/mN: 30
Frequency 20-20000 Hz=/-dB: 1,5
Channel separation 1000>dB: 25
Output mV/cm/s RMS: 0,6
Cartridge weight gram: 1,6
through the Beoworld site we can read almost everything about B&O World.
regards and enjoy the music, Raul. |
MMC1 actually has smaller diamond cross section and lower effective mass then MMC2. I can dig my MMC2 manual for exact differences. |
Dear Lewm: Good. Now I can asure you that everyone here will wait for your MMC1 " today " experiences.
Yes, the B&O gives us another discussion level away from mediocrity.
Ok, when do you start your B&O listening?. Btw, 600.00 for the MMC1 is still a bargain: you have to take in count that that cartridge is the " hand selected " MMC2.
Regards and enjoy the music, Raul. |
Raul, You are a piece of work. Thank you for raising the value of my NOS B&O MMC1. I probably should not use it at all, because that would lower the value. I think I paid $600 for mine; that was the most money I spent on any of these MM/MI examples. My reason for bringing it up was simply to generate discussion; thanks for the discussion. I was getting a little bored with the Signet stylus discussion that came before. Also, since I have many cartridges here that I have not heard yet, your and any one else's opinions help me to decide what to listen to next. I don't like fiddling with cartridge installation, so it is my inclination to listen to what is installed in the system on any given evening, and I only get one or two hours a day to listen to music. All of these are reasons why I asked about the B&Os.
By the way, I posted before you did on the need for a special adapter for the B&O, so if anyone is considering buying the one on eBay, they should take into account the extra $50 that SoundSmith will charge for a custom adapter. Peter Lederman does not much like making them, either, so you may have to wait. |
I forgot, IMHO this MMC2 B&O cartridge sample beats any known LOMC cartridge out there: no contest on that comparison.
Enough for today on that B&O cartridge.
Raul. |
Dear friends: Maybe you could think that the MMC3, 4 or five could give you the MMC2 and 1 MAGIC, don't make a misunderstoon/mistake: IMHO the differences between the lower steps models in that B&O cartridge series is abysmal for say the least. Btw, I own too the cartridges in the 6000 series and even a SP12 or 15 I can't remember. I always be confident on B&O very good and serious cartridge designs.
So now that there is the source for the cartridge is IMHO the best time to buy it while it last in NOS condition and through a confident source.
Regards and enjoy the music, Raul. |
Maybe more, that depends on each audio system behavior.
R. |
Btw, due to its very neutral " color " and lower distortions the B&O MMC 1 or 2 maybe you need to hear it with 0.5db to 1.0 db added to your normal SPL system everyday listening.
Raul. |
Btw, could you believe that this tiny( cartridge weight only 2.5grs. ) gem running at 1gr in that non ideal cartridge/tonearm resonance frequency set up track clean and in spectacular way ( not colored but real/true. ) the Telarc 1812?, well it did: I can't believe it!!!!
Lewm, do you like the piano music? well you will be on heaven with this B&O cartridge.
Raul. |
Dear Lewm: The B&O cartridges looks like a P-mount cartridge but certainly are not at least not belongs to the T4P ( P-mount universal. ) standards.
All the typical P-mount cartridges ( Grado, Technics, ADC, Shure, Audio Technica, Empire, Azden, Andante, etc, etc. ) that we know share at least these " standard " characteristics: same cartridge weight, same cartridge VTF, same stylus to top cartridge plate height and same stylus place distance for similar overhang, same pin connectors codification and same stylus angle. This permit to the P-mount owners changes in cartridges using the same universal adaptor/headshell with out need to change any parameter than the electrical ones to listen different P-mount cartridges, a very nice " touch " and a Bravo! for all those true P-mount cartridge manufacturers that for once in their " lives " thinked in we customers and gives what we need: good!
The B&O cartridges are way different an out of those P-mount standards, example: the P-mount standard on VTF is 1.25grs and the B&O MMC1/2 is 1gr. and the other P-mount characteristics are way different too like the cartridge pin connectors codification that's is different.
Normally the B&O 20 models and the MMC1/2 comes with a B&O dedicated adaptor to use it in any tonearm. The models like the 20CL has two options: that dedicated B&O universal adaptor or a B&O dedicated universal removable/bayonet headshell similar to the Saturn in the Acutex line. For the MMC1/2 the only choice is the dedicated B&O universal adaptor that time to time comes through ebay or we can ask to SS.
If you read the main thread page you can see that in those times I put those B&O models like a top quality performers. Maybe you bought it because of that. Through the time I posted no less than six-seven alerts on these cartridges and one way or the other I posted about its high quality.
This is at least the third time that you ask on B&O when you are an owner and where I can't understand why some one ask about quality performance in an audio item he owns and that never heard it, nothing wrong with that but is something weird for me.
Nevermind, your post " move " to listen again my MMC2 and I mounted in the Grace G-945 with a 15grs Dynavector 507 headshell. 100k on load impedance along 200pf added capacitance, VTF 1.0gr, SRA/VTA positive, azymuth centered.
In that set up the performance is nothing less than spectacular nothing less that a cartridge quality performance that belongs to very top out there. I compared against the Empire 1080LT and 4000D3, Technics 100CMK4 and Audio Technica 160ML.
IMHO the cartridge is so good that in many ways could put the 100CMK4 on " shame " and yes is IMHO better than the 1080LT/4000D3 and at the same level than the 100CMK4 ( stand alone cartridge model. ( Btw, I tested the 100CMK3 integrated headshell and the cartridge is good but nothing that compares against the mk4 stand alone model or even the 205MK4 stand alone model. The ones of you that are looking for the Technics my advise is that forget about the cartridge integrated headshell models: a waist of time and money and try/wait till you find out the stand alone models. That headshell IMHO " destroy/degrade " the cartridge performance and from a very high quality performance in the stand alone models the integrated ones IMHO comes down to an almost " average " one. ).
The B&O will shows any limitations we could have in our system and this means that IMHO if this cartridge can't shine really shine in your system the problem could belongs on the cartridge matching set-up or due to system own limitations: the B&O MMC1/2 is a real jewel a real and amazing device where throught it you can discover what's recorded on your LPs.
The cartridge ( MMC1/2 )is so small/tiny/fragilethat you could think/ask your self how is that works so fabolous but did it on spare. Well, good that with these B&O cartridges I left the mediocrity performers behind.
I don't know when but surely I will make a " serious " and wide review on this gem, I need to compare too against the " Royal " AKG P100LE too.
In the mid time my advise is that any one of you buy the MMC1 or MMC 2 as soon you " see it ".
Btw, the SS similar models are good but IMHO are a little on the hi-fi side with out the tremendous natural feeling of the music that owns the B&O original ones.
Btw, for the last three-four years the price of the B&O MMC2 in NOS has no changed in this source:
http://www.lpgear.com/Merchant2/merchant.mvc?Screen=PROD&Store_Code=LG&Product_Code=BOMMC2&Category_Code=B_O
you can see that the price is 300.00 less than the price on that ebay seller.
Lewm, lucky you are that already owns that B&O MMC1 in NOS condition and I don't think you paid for it the " today " cartridge asking price.
Regards and enjoy the music, Raul. |