Issues on both sides. Buyer should have asked more questions before purchase. Seller was obligated to honor a stated 30 day return policy. Publication of this policy (website, in ads, in correspondence) by the seller essentially negates the "hidden agon tab". IE seller explicitly stated their policy is different than the agon baseline. Seller should have reversed the sale upon notice from the buyer.
Is a seller obligated to disclose previous repairs/service etc ? Personally I believe a seller is obligated. However the question is ethical rather than legal. When selling a house, the seller is legally obligated to disclose issues that may be detrimental (damage, latent issues etc). When selling a car, it is incumbent on the buyer to uncover all issues before the purchase.
Personally, I have purchased "refurbished" items and have enjoyed excellent performance. I like "refurbished" as it means the item was not only serviced, any deficiencies were corrected, and the item was fully tested to ensure it met published specifications. In some cases "refurbished" results in a component in better condition than one purchased as new retail stock. And all is done with full disclosure.
Is a seller obligated to disclose previous repairs/service etc ? Personally I believe a seller is obligated. However the question is ethical rather than legal. When selling a house, the seller is legally obligated to disclose issues that may be detrimental (damage, latent issues etc). When selling a car, it is incumbent on the buyer to uncover all issues before the purchase.
Personally, I have purchased "refurbished" items and have enjoyed excellent performance. I like "refurbished" as it means the item was not only serviced, any deficiencies were corrected, and the item was fully tested to ensure it met published specifications. In some cases "refurbished" results in a component in better condition than one purchased as new retail stock. And all is done with full disclosure.