The obvious question to me is this. Did the OP disclose that the unit he traded was not working properly? Does anyone else see the irony that after the dealer repaired it, OP wants it back? Is this a case of what goes around comes around?
Maybe be I misunderstood, but everyone seems to be missing the fact that the trade in equipment needed repair.
Maybe be I misunderstood, but everyone seems to be missing the fact that the trade in equipment needed repair.