Apbiii, This looks like a circular argument because 'sales price' and the 'market price' (not 'place') are the same.
The old classical economist like Ricardo, Smith, Marx, etc.
differentiated between the 'value in use' and the 'value in exchange' and even between the values and prices. But nobody got this 'theory of value' consistent. So we still use money value to value goods while nobody knows which value our money will have next year.
Blueranger assumed some connection between the 'çost of production' and the market prices and he is right to do so according to even the modern economic theory. BTW no buseness is possible without comparison between those two magnitudes. His argument is , if I understand him well, that the prices of carts (MC's in particular) lost any connection with the cost of production. The market place on the other hand is the same for the reach as well for the poor. We all know who can afford + 4 K carts. So it
should be obvious for whom such carts are produced. Those are called 'exclusive market segments' and are as such exception of the rule.
Regards,
The old classical economist like Ricardo, Smith, Marx, etc.
differentiated between the 'value in use' and the 'value in exchange' and even between the values and prices. But nobody got this 'theory of value' consistent. So we still use money value to value goods while nobody knows which value our money will have next year.
Blueranger assumed some connection between the 'çost of production' and the market prices and he is right to do so according to even the modern economic theory. BTW no buseness is possible without comparison between those two magnitudes. His argument is , if I understand him well, that the prices of carts (MC's in particular) lost any connection with the cost of production. The market place on the other hand is the same for the reach as well for the poor. We all know who can afford + 4 K carts. So it
should be obvious for whom such carts are produced. Those are called 'exclusive market segments' and are as such exception of the rule.
Regards,