I never spoke of microdynamics versus timbre...you misread my posts...
Before blaming someone for misreading your post, take a moment to review what you actually wrote. Yes, of course — everything about sound is vibration; no vibration, no sound. But you specifically brought microdynamics into the discussion, which led to a confusing and incorrect statement. Please do not misuse terminology here. Microdynamics do not create or lead to timbral characteristics — not if you truly understand what you're talking about.
First Timbre pertain to the microdynamics of the vibrating object ...
i was speaking of the vibrating sound source, for example a vibrating violin, under the touch of a musician which total resulting microdynamics created a timbre quality perceived differently from different location...
As explained earlier, timbre is tonal color of sound and is fundamentally defined by the spectrum of harmonics and their relative amplitudes. (https://www.britannica.com/science/timbre). Therefore, harmonic content has more direct, effective control over timbre. One can use various means such as choice of DAC/filters, tubes, EQ to directly / effectively shape timbre. It is well known that adding or reducing second and third harmonics gives a warm or more clinical tone respectively — a direct change in timbre. Here is an actual example presented by GoldSound in measuing one of the Smsl DACs.
On the other hand, room acoustics have an indirect and relatively moderate influence on timbre. While they can affect the perception of sound, they do not alter the fundamental harmonic structure of the source. If you begin with a room or listening space with poor acoustics, treating the room will, of course, lead to a dramatic improvement in overall sound characteristics. However, this does not justify the misleading claim that room acoustics are the more dominant factor in timbre accuracy or shaping. That is why a lot of audiophiles continuously roll the tubes, change/upgrade DAC (r2r, hybrid), preamp, etc.
