@decooney I have used them with LS3/5a type speakers including Spendor, Harbeth, etc. BTW, all 8 ohm!
What is Moving From Solid State to Quicksilver Mid Monos Like?
Hello to all!
I currently have a McCormack DNA125 modified / upgraded in a manor similar to what McCormack does. It is fine sounding, but I have a curiosity (itch?) about what
I would experience if I moved to a pair of the current Quicksilver mid mono amplifiers. Can anyone out there who has made a move from good SS equipment
to the mid monos tell me what they gained that made them happier with the sound?
Thanks in advance!
- ...
- 14 posts total
Good to know @yogiboy and thanks for responding. I'm thinking most of Mike's QS amps seem to respond and sound, dare I say, more musical with higher impedance speakers, 8ohm and above. |
Fastcat95, In a huge coincidence, I am the third person in this thread to also move from a DNA-125 to Mid Monos. I also used Frieds (A3s) with my Mid Monos as well as Spendor 1/2s, and sadly these amps (paired with the QS linestage and using really nice EL34s) were just too lean for me in the bass and mids compared to the DNA-125. They were also a bit grainy in the highs in my set-up. I solved that problem by eventually moving to the Mono 120s, which I still use now using KT120s and Gold Lion small tubes. I also own KT Monos using Mike's stock KT-88s (Chinese) with RCA NOS 12AX7s and EH12BH7s...absolutely superb amps that are far better than the Mid Monos, imo, in every area. Looking back, maybe I should have tried some KT88s in my Mid Monos to fatten them up some. If you want to jump to Quicksilvers, I suggest starting with KT88s or KT120s if the power transformers are up to it. If too lean, you can easily sell them and then grab a pair of KT Monos or Mono 120s, which kick the DNA-125's butt up and down the street! |
Interesting @bojack how you are using the small input/driver Gold Lyons. I pulled my vintage 1960s Mullards [had PSVanes] prior, out of my Quicksilver Mono 120s and decided to order and install the small GL (12au7, 12at7s) a few weeks back. So far so good. I suspect a bit more time is needed on the small GL tubes. I did this [trying the little GLs] to try and bring out more of midrange body the prior-prior PSVane had, and yet not lose too much of the detail the vintage 60s Blackburn plant Mullards have. The GLs seem to sit right in the middle of the prior two pairs so far in the QS M120s. When the Mono 120 transformers are fully warm, it opens up a little more. I’m testing more this weekend with the new little GLs. Opt Bias is a kept bit low on the amps now. I will go ahead and turn the bias back up 10ma more on the main KT120 output tubes to see what happens - now with small GL tubes in. For those same reasons you mention, I encouraged member @hilde45 to jump up to the QS Mono 60s a few years back. This was before the new version multi-purpose QS KT Monos came out.. Hilde45 has been able to try different speakers as a results, and his amps nicely run KT77s today IIRC, although I believe he’s also tried KT88s, KT150s, KT120s with different efficiency and types of speakers now too. I was in town and heard his setup with KT77s before. With those amps, the KT77s sit nicely between EL34s and KT88s as I recall it sounding. I can see why Mike Sanders decided to develop the new KT Monos even more so now fwiw.
|
- 14 posts total