What 6922's tubes are you using in your lamm s ?

Amperex 6922 D-getters late 1950's all i can say is WOW!
The detail and soundstage is mindboggling vs the others.

Expensive yes but .....

The 2492 tube is a step above the 6922.For really premium sound I find the 2493 even superior.Be sure they are really Mullard and made prior to mid 1970.I have used both in my LL2 with outstanding results.Sorry no experience with the 1.1 or 2.1 but these should do the trick.
Enjoy

The ML2.1 does not use 6922

In checking further.The 1.1 doesn't use the 6922 tube either.
Hey Nolitan,whats the story ???

I bought 4 Russian cryoed 6922s from Tubemandotcom for my Raysonic 168 CD player. Since it has variable XLR outs I use it instead of a preamp- GREAT TUBES

Tvad, Maybe,But it makes me wonder when the OP leaves this early in their thread.
Do you still have the Blackburns ? Can I ask where did you
get them??
Man, Lamm sure makes great stuff.I would love to try his Amps.Can't afford them though.

I use Amperex Bugle Boy 6DJ8's (early 60's) in my M1.2 - I like them ;)

yes, its the M1.1s or the newer M1.2 Reference.
They use 6922s

Siemens CCa

any one here using 6922s from ei, electroharmonix, jjs or the likes for the lamms hybrids ? are those any better from the sovteks ? tks fr inputs

Nolitan,

I use the Amperex Pinched waist 6922 in my Lamm M2.1 monoblock amps, and my friend also uses them in his Lamm M2.2s. These are rather expensive, and tend to run between $300-500 for a pair. (I used to use Amperex 6DJ8 Orange Globes, which were almost as good, but quite a bit cheaper, @ $50-100 a pair.)

I use Telefunken 6DJ8 in my Lamm 1.2 amps. They are 1968 vintage with the Falcon Crest. Outstanding tubes--brought the amps to a new level. Previously, I was using Siemans and Halske red label 6922. These were a great improvement against the stock soviet 6922, but not nearly as impressive as the Telefunken.