Hi @audiozenology:
This means I measured the impedance and FR of each driver in the near field to achieve quasi-anechoic measurements. I further took the crossover apart and simulated the entire speaker in XSim. I validated my simulation by matching the simulated frequency and impedance curves to actual.
I then compared the simulated original crossover to a simulated crossover using a more conventional approach. So when I write:
This means that the input of the crossover to the output of the crossover would have been the same given the measured driver impedance.
What you are describing is akin to notch filters. That’s not what was present, and if I had not taken this into account, the two transfer functions would have been different. Further, resonance filters typically appear at the top end of a driver’s range, not the bottom.
Best,
E
I did a complete speaker and crossover analysis.
This means I measured the impedance and FR of each driver in the near field to achieve quasi-anechoic measurements. I further took the crossover apart and simulated the entire speaker in XSim. I validated my simulation by matching the simulated frequency and impedance curves to actual.
I then compared the simulated original crossover to a simulated crossover using a more conventional approach. So when I write:
would have duplicated the transfer function
This means that the input of the crossover to the output of the crossover would have been the same given the measured driver impedance.
What you are describing is akin to notch filters. That’s not what was present, and if I had not taken this into account, the two transfer functions would have been different. Further, resonance filters typically appear at the top end of a driver’s range, not the bottom.
Best,
E