In my experience you can use too much water. Once the lp is wet and the wand pads are wet, when the vacuum cycle is over (2 revolutions) you’ll still have wet wand pads to some degree. I’ve noticed the slot in the wand really isn’t long enough toward the outer edge of an lp. If just 2 more mm, I suspect that would cure some of the issue. On my machine (16.5) the wand moves outward during the cleaning process and I have to be aware of it and push it back into it’s holder every 3-4 lps. Don’t push too hard as I’ve cracked several this way.
VPI 16.5 Cleaning Machine - Drying Question
Not sure if this is the right forum to pose this question so moderator, feel free to move to appropriate forum if I'm wrong.
I have a question about the drying of the VPI 16.5 machine. I will try to be brief, but that is not a strong suit of mine. :)
So i have a 16.5 and have had one for about 5 years. I started out using one step cleaning solution and didn't really have any issues other than hearing that multi-step solutions did a better job of cleaning records. I recently bought Disc Doctor Miracle Wash and have been using that in my cleaning process. I normally clean multiple records in one session (2-6 per cleaning session usually).I start by using a small amount of distilled water and use the VPI brush to lightly cover the record and vacuum with wand.Then I use the disc doctor cleaning solution and spread it using a disc doctor brush. Then I vacuum that with a different VPI wand.Then I apply another round of distilled water and vacuum with the original VPI wand and the VPI brush.
I've read to not be sparing when using water for the final rinse I use enough to fully cover the record in water.
After about the 2nd or 3rd lp, I start having some moisture still on the record after the final pass with the wand. I vacuum for two cycles and not more because of the static that can happen for longer vacuuming. The pads on the wand are usually pretty damp to the touch by this point which leads me to believe that is why there is still moisture on the record surface.
I've read other posts that say it should be completely dry and that leaving them out to dry invites dust and whatever to attract to the vinyl, defeating the purpose of the cleaning.
So my question is, am I using too much water? Do I need to alter my process? How much water should be used in that final stage? HELP!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!
I have a question about the drying of the VPI 16.5 machine. I will try to be brief, but that is not a strong suit of mine. :)
So i have a 16.5 and have had one for about 5 years. I started out using one step cleaning solution and didn't really have any issues other than hearing that multi-step solutions did a better job of cleaning records. I recently bought Disc Doctor Miracle Wash and have been using that in my cleaning process. I normally clean multiple records in one session (2-6 per cleaning session usually).I start by using a small amount of distilled water and use the VPI brush to lightly cover the record and vacuum with wand.Then I use the disc doctor cleaning solution and spread it using a disc doctor brush. Then I vacuum that with a different VPI wand.Then I apply another round of distilled water and vacuum with the original VPI wand and the VPI brush.
I've read to not be sparing when using water for the final rinse I use enough to fully cover the record in water.
After about the 2nd or 3rd lp, I start having some moisture still on the record after the final pass with the wand. I vacuum for two cycles and not more because of the static that can happen for longer vacuuming. The pads on the wand are usually pretty damp to the touch by this point which leads me to believe that is why there is still moisture on the record surface.
I've read other posts that say it should be completely dry and that leaving them out to dry invites dust and whatever to attract to the vinyl, defeating the purpose of the cleaning.
So my question is, am I using too much water? Do I need to alter my process? How much water should be used in that final stage? HELP!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!
6 responses Add your response