Voyagers Being Delivered. Comments Please


I haven't gotten mine yet, so looking for comments.

I've said all along that it's going to take something really special to improve upon my EVS 1200. And since I first started the fire of interest for the Voyager, I discovered how much better coax is than optical. That discovery alone has made a quantum improvement, so...
tweak1
LSA Voyager GaN 350......350 watts a channel GaN amp....been delayed for almost 2 years.  Hopefully, it is good.  We shall see.

https://www.underwoodhifi.com/products/lsa-electronics

The other thread has been overrun with ASR fetishists, so since I actually own a Voyager, I feel like it's safe to comment here. I am merely a high school English and guitar teacher, not an electrical engineer, but I have owned some nice equipment over the years. I can only relate that for me the LSA is a clear step up from Parasound Halo A21 it's replacing, and while my W4S SX-1000R monos are awesome, I find the LSA to be smoother and more refined, while being quite competitive with the W4S on the bottom end. The W4S are heading for HT duty. The LSA is a very good amp and I'm quite pleased with it. 

Thanks. I needed some pallet cleanser after reading 30+ comments that will likely get Jays' thread pulled, mostly because Ric cannot keep his new age comments to himself. 

I had an A23, which leaned toward dark, and was extremely warm to the touch, in spite of it being in a wide open space.

 

I owned several W4S amps, including; stereo, mono, and multichannel: None held a candle to my stock Yoyager, or my Ric Schultz EVS1200, which I raved about until the V arrived

" I can only relate that for me the LSA is a clear step up from Parasound Halo A21 it's replacing, and while my W4S SX-1000R monos are awesome, I find the LSA to be smoother and more refined, while being quite competitive with the W4S on the bottom end."

This is interesting as I found the exact opposite to be true. I have the Parasound A23+ in a professionally calibrated system. The Voyager, while refined, just didn't engage! It's sound did not project into the room like the Parasound did. My wife and I were not engaged in comparison. The Voyager checks most of the boxes if you break down the soumd, but the sum of those parts just didn't add up in the end. The Parasound was much more engaging and just sounded more correct. Parasound tonality was much better too. I put on a Sinatra sound from a well recorded album. It's very dynamic and sounds fantastic on the Parasound. With the Voyager, it sounded like I was streaming it. His voice had only a fraction of the weight that it should have had. It sounded flat and boring in comparison. Bass is also tighter on the Parasound. When the horn section came in, it was much more dynamic on the Parasound than the Voyager. This was my experience over several weeks with it. I wanted to like it, but the Parasound was too good to let go.

I loved my A21 a lot, and I wouldn't have replaced it, but it needed an extensive repair that would have essentially cost the same as I paid for the unit back in 2006. Rather than just get another one or the  new A21+, I simply wanted to try something new, and I specifically was interested in GaN technology. I took recent advantage of the sale Underwood is having, and I don't regret it. I don't think I even have 70 hours on it yet, but for me the magic is in the midrange with this amp. It is fantastic with vocals. Right now, the bass is not up to the the A21 standards, but I think it will improve with further break in. FWIW, my DAC is the Gustard X26 Pro and the ELAC Vela 403. 

I am aware that some of you complained about not enough bass. Don't know if they simply used the stock soft rubber feet, which IMO sucked a lot of life out of it: well I just uncovered it, taking my Voyager to a much higher level of enjoyment by simply replacing my 6 yo old+ Machina Dynamica springs under everything prior to buying the Nobs @~ $8/4, which have 7 springs in each. And they definitely improved the sound, but I started watching this thread: 

 Nobsound springs - load range, which is very informative about the amount of weight each spring is designed to handle.  Well, late yesterday I started pulling springs out, starting with 3 springs/3 Nobs under my Oppo 105 first (decent improvement). Today I got busy, starting with my LSA Voyager GaN 350 amp (OMG!), then my Audio Alchemy DDP-1 + PS 5 (here I only used 2 each X 3). This leaves my Core Power 1800 PLC, which currently has 4 Machina Dynamica springs, and eventually my EP 3.4 OB speakers, a 2 person job as they are currently on Harbor Freight dollies.

 

I am totally amazed. I now have authoritative bass- mid bass, which gives the music significantly more drive, putting a big smile on my face listening to Lyle Lovett The Road to Ensenada CD. One of my torture test CDs is Jennifer Nettles Playing With Fire. It's on as I write this. Where many of the songs sounded thin, so far it sounds natural, like she's in the room.

 

hth

 

A week ago I sold my~ 10 yo SVS powered subs. While they added weight, they weren't high quality 2 channel subs. I didn't realize how much they set my sound back until they were gone, and I moved he speakers back ~ 2ft, now ~50" from the front wall.

Tonite, I finally got around to taking my Emerald Physics 3.4s off the Harbor Freight dollys which they've been on since I got them over a year ago. Each base is resting on 4 full spring Nobsounds. Quite an improvement, richer tone in the lower mids and bass as well as fullness