2. speakers
  3. 123204-77087

Two-channel sub connection options

I apologize if this isn’t a very high-end question, but perhaps my ignorance will amuse you.

I recently retired the full-range speakers I’ve been using with my Integrated Amp and replaced them with some smaller speakers which will require a subwoofer. For want of a LFE output on the amp it appears that I’m obliged to run speaker cables from its System B outputs to the High Level inputs on the sub.

Question #1: Does that mean that some substantial fraction of my two-channel amp’s power will be diverted to the sub, bypassing the subwoofer’s own internal amplifier?

Question #2:  If I simply need a two-channel line-level signal for the sub that is subject to the same volume control as my primary speakers, could I not use the headphone jack on the amp (which has no separate volume control) and run a 1/4" Phone Male to Two RCA Male Cable to the sub’s RCA inputs?

If both of these options are possible, which is preferable?


128x128zoltar93
8 responses Add your response
zoltar93's avatar
zoltar93 OP
6 posts
 
Those strike me as perfectly legitimate criteria for setting your preferred bass level. 
wolf_garcia
6,695 posts
 
If a REL sub is used as most people prefer (high level from a power amp speaker output), the amp "sees" a 100,000 ohm burden, which is a lot like nothing at all. I use 2 RELs on the same power amp with the main speakers on the same output…works very well…(resulting in a 50,000 ohm load maybe) both RELs sum the stereo mix as one of the subs is stuck in a window for deck sound occasionally. This allows the main speakers to work as designed, which could be better than shelving the bass with a crossover as, again, they likely weren't voiced for that…but can still sound fine I suppose. I don't bother with an SPL meter for the RELs to match the mains somehow, as they are turned up and down a bit relative to my taste, the amount of bass energy in a recording, how much Irish whisky I've consumed, and if my wife can be compelled to dance with me. 
zoltar93's avatar
zoltar93 OP
6 posts
 
That makes perfectly good sense - I just couldn't find it explained elsewhere,

I  have a SPL mater I used to balance my HT system.   

Thanks for your help.
Post removed 
zoltar93's avatar
zoltar93 OP
6 posts
 
Ok, that makes sense.  I had no idea how the high-level connections could gather the information of the signal without drawing the same current as speakers would.

I had a hunch the headphone jack wouldn't work, or else it would be a known option.

My  Marantz integrated amp does not have preamp outputs, but I'm fine with the line level connections, just as long as the sub's internal amp will still be doing the heavy lifting.

Thanks,
Bob.
Post removed 
zoltar93's avatar
zoltar93 OP
6 posts
 
Thanks, Dan.  That's what I was hoping.  It would be frustrating to have the sub's onboard amp go to waste, while its big driver sucks current the stereo amp should devote to the main speakers.

I wonder why this arrangement is kept such a secret.  I haven't seen anything published about subs explain how they handle high-level signals.
Ag insider logo xs@2x
islandmandan
1,260 posts
 
I'm no expert on this, but I believe the high-level signal received by the sub is converted to a low-level signal before being used by the amplification process in the sub's amp.

I run two subs in my two-channel/HT system by running them off the two-channel preamp using siamese connectors. While this is viewed as being wrong by HT aficionados, it works well for me, as my main focus is two-channel listening.

Good luck,
Dan
Log in to respond
More to discover
80x80
Martin Logan Classic ESL 9A
80x80
Lansche Audio No 7
80x80
KEF Blade 2