Turntable got absolutely crushed by CD


Long story short, i've just brought home a VPI classic 1 mounted with a Zu-Denon DL103 on JMW Memorial 10.5 with the appropriate heavier counterweight. Had everything dialed in..perfect azimuth, VTF, overhang, with only a slightly higher than perfect VTA. Levelling checked. All good. 

I did a comparison between the VPI and my Esoteric X03SE and it's not even close. The Esoteric completely crushes the VPI in all regards. The level of treble refinement, air, decay, soundstage depth and width, seperation, tonality, overall coherence is just a simply a league above from what I'm hearing from the VPI. The only area the VPI seems to be better at is bass weight, but not by much. 

I'm honestly quite dumbfounded here. I've always believed that analogue should be superior to digital. I know the Esoteric is a much pricier item but the VPI classic is supposed to be a very good turntable and shouldn't be a slouch either. At this point I feel like I should give up on analogue playback and invest further in digital. 

Has anyone had a similar experience comparing the best of digital to a very good analogue setup?

Equipment:
Esoteric X03SE 
VPI Classic, JMW Memorial 10.5, Zu-DL103
Accuphase C200L
Accuphase P600
AR 90 speakers

Test Record/CD:
Sarah McLachlan - Surfacing (Redbook vs MOV 180g reissue)



chadsort
I appreciate your input, Audio Doctor.

I do have some digital flexibility here with both the T+A and the Berkeley. How much mainstream recorded music is available at DSD 256 or 512?  I bought the T+A strictly as a SACD player, but recognize its other abilities. 

I bought the Berkeley strictly based upon audition from CD sources. It's the best I've heard thus far. And I suspect MQA will become more readily available, better or not.

Is there a music server available that will do DSD 512 and MQA, something I could feed Both DACs with?
@imgoodwithtools the LUMIN U1 will do both DSD512, MQA and can feed both DACs.

Mike
Audio Archon - LUMIN Dealer

I have the original pressing of Brothers in arms, the cd version (digitized) and the 180 gram two disc version (analog).

If you want to test the sound quality of any stereo equipment, I recommend using the track brothers in arms from that album/cd.

it is revealing.

I have a pretty darn good system including digital and I can listen to the digital system all day.  but, my analog system will still sound better than the digital system.

When I really want to sit and listen and I'm not lazy, I listen to the analog system. 

My CD transport is quite good, thank you, paired to my Audio Research DAC 9 and I'm there.  I also have an Aurender ACS10 that does bit perfect ripping and it into the DAC 9 makes wonderful music.

but, I have found that a really good analog system still beats a really good digital system. 

An analog recording (well made) vs a Digital recording, the digital sound for want of a better word, compressed.

An analog rig playing a digital recording vs the digital rig playing a cd of the same digital recording and its hard to hear much difference, if the recording is done well.

I'm not an analog fanboy and could listen to my digital system all day.  But, I have often had people over where we played music on the analog system and the same music on the digital system and although they liked the digital system's sound, they preferred the analog.

but, analog depends on quite a few more factors.

turntable rig, tonearm, cartridge, cabling from turntable to phone stage, phono stage.

digital rig is more simple.  CD player/transport, cable from CD/player to pre-amp, or from Transport to DAC, DAC.  Best is CD transport to DAC vs CD player. 

enjoy

What is curious by such ''general statements'' is the fact that
people always forget to add ''according to me''. The obvious
reason  is that people pretend to say something about
properties of the objects in casu while what they really say is
their subjective opinion. Ergo: they say something about them self
not about the objects discussed.  
Post removed 
And yeah and many of us have heard several examples of analog reel-to-reels absolutely smoking supposedly state-of-the-art digital