The science of opinion ...

Well, that only took a week. Wrapping the same holier than thou dogma in velvet doesn’t change what it is. Your change of tactics is obvious and pretty sand lot.
Perhaps you should delete your membership again, change your user name again, and give it a third shot. What have you got to lose?
Certainly not respect.

Here's getting back on the topic of The Science of Opinion-
I am of the opinion that I don't require science to back up what I know I hear.

Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz......
You have officially bored me sleep.
It was fun for a bit. Now it’s a petty annoyance.
So, you continue to believe in your holy cause to convert the ignorant masses, and I shall continue to enjoy music and ignore you.
I’m with uber, Beatles it is!
One final word-no. No you really don't.

atdavid, so now you're going to tell ME what I mean? A very succinctly wrote what I meant. It can be said one's perception is one's reality, Bla bla bla.....When I add a tweak to my system and I put on a song I know inside and out and hear a subtle nuance I've never heard before time and time again, yeah, I KNOW what I'm hearing. You are just another guy in a long line of guys that came before you trying to save the audio souls of those you perceive as ignorant, fooling themselves, being shilled etc....simply because we don't require reams of scientific evidence to back up why we hear what we hear, and if there is none forthcoming, we can't possibly be hearing it. 'Threatening'?? "Afraid of'?? What a joke. Amusing and mildly annoying, you bet.

atdavid--"If I have any goal at all, it is to help other people not fool themselves."
And you have just proven my point in my last post.
Lordy, I have been rescued from the darkness and see the light....!
Like I said, just another guy in a long line of guys who fancy themselves as audio saviors telling people they’re not really hearing what they hear.