Wow - great question. If you’ve heard ever TAD’s and like the sound, there is no way you will disappointed with CR1’s. Like other very high end speakers, perhaps even more so, the CR1’s are going to deliver dependent upon what amp is powering them and the upstream components.
I’ve found an amazing match for my CR1’s with PS Audio BHK300’s, but the stereo version 250 will work very well. My speakers are essentially a different animal than when I first got them back around 2010, simply because the ancillary gear around them got so much better.
What I find the CR1’s do extremely well is inner detail and leading edge.
These are the two qualities I identify when listening to live acoustic music played in home settings or small venues, which I hear quite often. So my reference isn’t the best HI FI available, its live music.
Many years ago I went to the launch of the Magico Q1 speaker. It was immaculately set up in a dealer’s showroom, and with the unfamiliar audiophile tracks they were playing it was astounding. Fireworks astounding. I requested some "real world" tracks I knew, one from Bill Evans and another Rickie lee jones. They demo then fell flat, with one of tracks so lackluster, it was taken off before it was over.
Less than an hour later, I was back home and played the same tracks on CR1’s. One was even the same pressing as was played. These same songs now sounded shockingly like audiophile recording, with so much inner life and detail it was hard to believe. And this was a long time ago with when my TAD’s didn’t sound anything like they do today, as the ancillary gear got so much better.
As far as the Blades, I have never heard them in what I’d consider a proper setup. Being interested in concentric designs, I took particular interest in hearing them any opportunity I could at local audio shows. I believe I heard the Blades at two different years shows, and the Blade 2 at another show. I know people speak highly of them, so perhaps they were a poor representation all 3 times. What I can say is that I heard nothing that sounded anything like the lifelike sound I hear from the TAD’s, and I was extremely disappointed in the demos.
I have extended the range on the low end of my TAD’s with a pair of Velodyne DD10+ subs. I don’t use always them late night so as not to disturb neighbors, but there are times when the subs (I run them 40hz and below) really extends the palpability and I suspect are closer to what the much larger Reference one would sounds like in my room.
At one time I became enamored by the Raidho’s and felt they offered more air up top than the TAD’s. I added an Enigmacoustics ’stat super tweeter and regained some of the sparkle I felt I was missing at the time (which was a very different setup than I have now) I currently run the super tweeters as rear facing ambience, but will soon try them again facing forward once again since getting the EtherRegen in the system and the massive improvement on the digital side of my system.
Some day I would love to own a large SoundLab electrostat or even perhaps the new PS Audio line source speakers when released.
But I will never sell the TAD’s. I do have the Andrew Jones designed Adante Center channel, but I have this fantasy of finding a single orphan CR1 whose mate was destroyed in shipping or perhaps another CR1 owner to go in with me and splitting a pair up to use one as a center channel.