Some famous reviewers have atrocious listening rooms!


It’s almost sad, really.  Some reviewers I’ve been reading for decades, when showing their rigs on YouTube, have absolutely horrible rooms.  Weird shaped; too small w/o acoustic treatment; crap all over the place within the room or around the speakers; and on and on.  
 

Had I known about the listening rooms they use to review gear in the past, I would not have placed such a value on what they were writing.  I think reviewers should not just list the equipment they used in a given review, but be required to show their listening rooms, as well.
 

Turns out my listening room isn’t so bad, after all.  

 

 

audiodwebe

Showing 1 response by tonywinga

I would not want to review equipment.  It would take the enjoyment of the music away for me.  I would not be able to separate the work side from the relaxing pleasure side.  Listening would become work all the time for me.  I grew up in the 1960s watching TV.  So for me any class or seminar I had to watch on a TV screen felt like entertainment for me.  If the speaker is in front of me in person it feels like work, but if they are on a TV screen it feels like entertainment.  

It was the same years ago when playing golf with the customer.  I could not relax and enjoy the game.  I felt I had to be attentive and aware of everything and anything I said and did.

When I get into the stereo upgrade mode it is all about listening and discerning differences.  The pleasure of just hearing the music becomes secondary.  Fortunately, once I am satisfied with the sound I can get out of upgrade mode and go back to enjoying the music.  I’m the last person that could sit there and take notes while listening to music.