Outlaw vs. B&K


Hello all,

I’m looking for opinions on the following gear. I have a Outlaw 7125 Amp with an Outlaw 990 pre-amp. I also have a B&K model 202 receiver. I just bought 2 Snell type D speakers that I’m currently using the B&K on. The speakers are awesome. I am using the setup mostly for music. I do have the Outlaw in a separate room with all Definitive technology speakers and a Martin Logan sub hooked up and it sounds great. My question before I tear everything apart is should I hook the Outlaw up to the Snells or is it not going to make much difference. I know I can just do it and see. But, I’m looking for opinions before I put all that work into it. 
Any responses will be very much appreciated. 
tomk73
Just gave my bro a ref 20 and av5000II amp.... still work , except for amps auto turn on. Other than that  been flawless
Yes, I once owned the B&K Pro10MC paired with the ST-140 amp. Bought it in 1985 and it served me well for 25 years. Never has any problems.
Getting ready to have my B&K pro10mc-mc recapped and a new volume pot, as those who know this pre, are flustered by the static over the years. It’s the sealed pot, before I power on, I crank volume knob, back and forth about 30-40 X to try to catch the grease on either end of the pot and spread it.

 B& K make (made) amazing amps & preamps. 

I had a 990 / 7125 combo for a short time.   The amp was very good,  the 990 is better suited for surround in my opinion .  It isn't really analog in the stereo mode .  The B&K is better in my opinion.  My dad had that receiver with some Sonus Faber all around and it sounded great in stereo mode.    Try it, who knows....