Outlaw vs. B&K


Hello all,

I’m looking for opinions on the following gear. I have a Outlaw 7125 Amp with an Outlaw 990 pre-amp. I also have a B&K model 202 receiver. I just bought 2 Snell type D speakers that I’m currently using the B&K on. The speakers are awesome. I am using the setup mostly for music. I do have the Outlaw in a separate room with all Definitive technology speakers and a Martin Logan sub hooked up and it sounds great. My question before I tear everything apart is should I hook the Outlaw up to the Snells or is it not going to make much difference. I know I can just do it and see. But, I’m looking for opinions before I put all that work into it. 
Any responses will be very much appreciated. 
tomk73
I had a 990 / 7125 combo for a short time.   The amp was very good,  the 990 is better suited for surround in my opinion .  It isn't really analog in the stereo mode .  The B&K is better in my opinion.  My dad had that receiver with some Sonus Faber all around and it sounded great in stereo mode.    Try it, who knows....   
Getting ready to have my B&K pro10mc-mc recapped and a new volume pot, as those who know this pre, are flustered by the static over the years. It’s the sealed pot, before I power on, I crank volume knob, back and forth about 30-40 X to try to catch the grease on either end of the pot and spread it.

 B& K make (made) amazing amps & preamps. 

Yes, I once owned the B&K Pro10MC paired with the ST-140 amp. Bought it in 1985 and it served me well for 25 years. Never has any problems.
Just gave my bro a ref 20 and av5000II amp.... still work , except for amps auto turn on. Other than that  been flawless