New Omega E Mat from Perfect Path Technologies


Many of you own or have read of the highly-regarded PPT Omega E Mat, one of Tim Mrock’s revolutionary signal-enhancing accessories. Just prior to his untimely passing, Tim had finished developing a new generation of his Omega mat, soon to be available. Krissy Mrock has asked a few of us to introduce this new mat, here given the working title of The Double Omega.

In distinguishing the Double Omega, we know the original Omega, herein called the single, as a 7.5” by 10”, rather heavy and somewhat pliable mat, a bit more than 1/8” thick and with a vinyl-like feel. One face is glossy white, displaying the PPT logo and Omega name, while the other is black, smooth and magnetized. Sandwiched between these faces is the active material that causes components to reject the EMI that saturates everything in our surroundings. The Double Omega is much the same, with one important difference: the magnetized face has the finely-textured feel of around, say, 220-grit sandpaper. This texture, it is presumed, comprises yet a second active layer of EMI rejection. Presumed—because working details of the Double Omega are not well understood—better yet to know how to apply it.

With the understanding that the single Omega E mats generate field effects from both faces, mats have typically been placed under and over components and vertically over circuit breakers. How you apply the Double Omega will depend on best use and experimentation. In my case, I have removed two single mats, lying side-by-side, from the top of my large Wadia CDP and have replaced those with two Double Omegas. The Wadia is a one-box player that contains a pre-amp, so I wanted that second, strong field effect exerting downward as well as upward. I also have several singles placed underneath, just as before. Going straight to amps, this player is my only source, so I want it fully protected from EMI. Your priorities will differ.

As of this writing, I am only thirty-hours in on placing these Double Omegas, and I can already tell you they are powerful in their prevention of EMI within my digital source. Yet another veil has been lifted—all instruments and voices are even more sorted out in the aural space with new information heard within that space. There is much more decay heard against a new silence behind and between the musicians. I am already so pleased and excited about what the Double Omega E mats are doing. As Krissy told me, Tim was really stoked to have these new mats available. Rather than wait for the the fourteen-day window of improvement, I want to get this intro out so others can relay their experiences sooner.


128x128jafreeman
jafreeman,

Oh yeah I now have lots of mats. 
But, I only have 4 of the Omega + mats. I have 2 of them in my breaker box. One under my Niagara 7000 and the other under my Ayre preamp.
They are mighty impressive in these positions. 
Right now, I have to spend $$$ on a tooth implant. So more mats will need to wait. Lol!

ozzy
Ozzy ...

Just for fun, take the two mats from under the Niagara 77000 and the Ayre and tape them to the backs of each speaker in line with the mid-range drivers and see what happens. 

Frank

Greetings all. Long term lurker on this this thread, and owner of regular and plus E-mats for a couple of months. I have already seen great results with the usual placement of mats in line with what everyone else reports. I currently have mats in the breaker box, behind the speaker drivers, under the amp, under the digital power supply for dac and streamer, and under an Isotek power strip which supplies them all.

I had a bit of a revelation today through an accidental re-arrangement of my cables, and wanted to report it, for the benefit of others. I get the impression from this thread that a number of key uses of the mats has come from experimentation, so here’s another one to try. (As always your results will vary with your particular system and circumstances.)

For a while I have been thinking about trialling cable lifters. My speakers are only about 1m either side of my amp, so my 1.5m speaker cables have a lot of slack in them, and cables had been lying on the ground (carpeted floor over concrete). Today I decided to tidy up the rear of the equipment rack. The Isotek power strip sits on the floor along the back of the rack, on top of two regular E-mats (the strip is only about half the depth of the mats). I tidied up the power cables, then in order to better separate the power cables from the speaker cables I coiled the slack part of the speaker cables into two loops per cable, secured with a cable tie. I then set these up so they sit vertically on the unused half of the E-mats. That way not only do I get most of the cable lifted up off the floor without having to use cable lifters, but the only (small) part of the cable which does touch the floor is resting on the front part of the E-mat.

The result is extraordinary. I would say a greater impact on noise floor, 3D image, separation and micro-detail than when putting the E-mats into the system in the first place on the breaker box and under the key components. This could be due to getting the speakers cables mostly off the floor (I might have had the same result with just cable lifters), but I suspect its more to do with getting the coiled part of the cable over and touching the E-mat. This may be something that other people have already reported, but if not, I suggest if you have some slack in your cables you try looping them and putting the loop on an E-mat and see if you also get a significant impact on sound. (if the cable wont stay on the mat, use a little blu-tack to hold it in place). I hope this helps people with another potential step up due to these amazing mats.


@yony-t1
 Thanks for the new possibilities of the emats+ .Or possibly the practicality of a new PPT product. Very interesting. Doesn't surprise me  much. Maybe different mats should be made thinner and wider to better work with the dimensions of speaker and other cables.