You know what people don't claim a 164 IQ in an internet discussion? ... people who actually have a 164 IQ. They don't need to because it is evident in their communication.
I would save your lies for people who won't call you out on it. If you had an IQ of 164, that would place you approximately 1 / 100,000. Your reading comprehension issues are clear indicators that that is not the case.
p.s. that would be:
- 70s , not '70s
- highest level, not higest
- Oh, but I forgot
So let me get this right. You have an IQ of 164, but you were part of the test group?
It is interesting that you were "part of the test group in the early 80s. So exactly which group was this?
jason_k201714 posts11-04-2019 4:25pmActually no. I was lecturing on modulation techniques in digital communications in the '70s. I was part of the test group for Quadrature Amplitude Modulation utilizing Trellis Encoding in the early '80s And my IQ of 164 got me into the higest levels of military technology development
Oh but I forgot........... I am ignorant