Looking back I should have named this thread: Why speaker designers have chosen 4 ohm impedance rather than higher IMP designs
… or why have they chosen 4 ohm over 8 ohm
The link at the bottom of this post is to another thread from 2013 which elaborates in depth on many aspects of the 4 ohm IMP speaker design trek modern transducer makers have embraced. Both amp and speaker makers chime in.
Remember too, its now four years later and the 8 ohm models are getting more and more scarce.
The input on that thread is immense. Mind numbingly technical. From it one can readily glean one vital point among a wealth of others, the greatest why of it all is simple. Volume? Yep. volume. Well, and cost.
One of the glaring obstacles for obtaining the best sound then is not merely to have a competent powerful amp but to also have one whose sonic manners are as close to unimpeachable as possible. Unimpeachable equates to impeccable, faultless, and just flat out killer sounding, or really freakin’ good. Words with that many letters in this hobby are directly proportionate to an old adage , ‘back up the Brinks truck. If you want one that is.
A more subtle and darker attribute is many very proficient amps of slighter builds are now off the table for consideration. Essentially the lower IMP speaker movement reduces choices for amplifier matching.
Further, the lower Q spkrs demand more stallwart , and talented voicing from an amp very often. Again, increasing the cost for said amp, and for many, lessening the possible contenders in the 2017 AFL (audio fidelity lovers) draft of amps.
No matter how one slices this pie, it will not taste good to the majority of pie lovers.
Rather than ignore the elephant in the room and sheepishly follow along without objection, I’d prefer to find out what and how others feel about this intentional price escalating parade. The balloons in this one are not Bulwinkle and Rocky, they are instead, inflatable’s resembling towering speakers and solid state mono amps with “COST NO OBJECT” tattoos.
Perhaps too, this note and more like it could at least increase awareness the current movement is headed towards a much smaller pond.
Not sure what it will take to enable former or new speaker designers to begin providing more ‘old school’ higher Q alternatives for quality loudspeaker designs and production. Probably just more noise on their emails, and phones.
Change. That’s the point. Change sure seems in order. Change will not occur without action. Well, not a desirable less expensive change. Vinyl’s recent comeback is a prime example change can and does occur, and that change does not always have to be negative. Neither is it as insurmountable as it appears.
Its like a ticking bomb. Leave it alone and it will go boom soon. Errantly defuse it and go boom. Don’t try to difuse it and it will boom too. But if it can be contained or rendered benign, life becomes sensible again.
https://forum.audiogon.com/discussions/what-s-with-4-ohm-speakers
it appears to be the gorilla in the room no one wishes to address.