My 2 cents:
Boycotting goods for political reasons is a form of political activism. We intend to induce change, or at the very least opt out of involvement with those we don't agree with, or find utterly disgusting. While we might feel better about ourselves, our "activism" may not produce the change we looking for. Oftentimes our "good intentions" actually make things worse for those we are trying to "help." I can sight many examples.
As far as the CCP is concerned, you don't have to look very deep to see how complex the income stream is for that country. Political royalty from all over the globe have expressed "public anti-CCP ideologies" yet take bribes and do business with those who, let's say, don't have our best interests at heart. So, we're sitting here at our desktop agonizing on whether or not to purchase a DAC from a Chinese company, while billions are being pushed in their direction by those we "trust". Yes, I get the "living with yourself" factor, and we all want to do the "right thing." I boycotted an American company that insulted their customers: "Here's our stance. If you don't agree with us you're stupid, and a terrible person." I understand the hesitation to support those who (as reported) are 180 degrees out of phase with our core values (or grossly misinterpret our values).
It gets back to the audio. Value is certainly a consideration. But, there not one person here that isn't willing to pay more to get more. Sometimes Chinese goods fill that basic requirement as well.