TY- dave_b.
Is there Really a difference between a Krell 400xi intergrated amp and the newer Vandgard?
I currently own a Krell 400xi intergrated amp. It has 200 watts a 750k toroidal, balanced inputs, etc. Its very similar to the current vanguard intergrated amp in terms of similar spec's. I would like to know if anyone upgraded and if it was worth it? Is the sound different does it go lower, deeper, more of an open sound stage or should I just consider another route to improve what I already have.
thanks,
thanks,
66 responses Add your response
Ok, so the question is whether or not the Krell Vanguard is superior to the 400xi. Well, yes in absolute terms and no if you are strapped for cash. Overall the Vanguard is clearer, more dynamic and slightly warmer. It also will not overheat and produces a more fleshed out soundstage. Bass has more texture and sounds natural as compared to the 400xi's taughter, leaner presentation. Both are great values and outperform the competition by a wide margin, IMO. FYI, Audiophileliquidaters have the Vanguard priced well below msrp! |
Post removed |
Jafant......yes, Krell and MIT have a long history with Thiels. I've read that the Vandguard integrated is the real deal; resolution, warmth, not sterile, powerful at 200 w/channel ( 400 @ 4 ohms ) and harmonically accurate. I would think this amp and the best MITs or Transparent cables would synergize quite well with your Thiel CS2.4se. Another integrated to research is the Belles Soloist 1. I had one and it was full and rich sounding with lots of power. Enjoy your journey. |
In that price range, I would suspect that the Wells Audio Majestic would easily beat either Krell model amp. Do a little research and you may find a gem. http://www.wellsaudio.com/products/integrated-amplifiers-2/majestic |