I wouldn't look at this in terms of cantilever movement, but perhaps Jonathan or Peter are lurking and can comment further.
A good way to think of compliance is in terms of mass compatibility with a tonearm.
In short, decreased compliance means the suspension is stiffer and tends to transmit more energy into the tonearm.
This in turn requires a more massive tonearm to bring the resonant frequency into range. Dealing with the extra energy encompasses the entire tonearm and turntable design although increased arm mass can help in this area too.
Think of a compliance mismatch from an automobile analogy. Picture the springs from a 3/4 ton pickup truck installed on a Porshce. This would be an extreme example comparable to too stiff of a cartridge on too light of a tonearm.
Cheeers,
Thom @ Galibier
A good way to think of compliance is in terms of mass compatibility with a tonearm.
In short, decreased compliance means the suspension is stiffer and tends to transmit more energy into the tonearm.
This in turn requires a more massive tonearm to bring the resonant frequency into range. Dealing with the extra energy encompasses the entire tonearm and turntable design although increased arm mass can help in this area too.
Think of a compliance mismatch from an automobile analogy. Picture the springs from a 3/4 ton pickup truck installed on a Porshce. This would be an extreme example comparable to too stiff of a cartridge on too light of a tonearm.
Cheeers,
Thom @ Galibier