No, shielding is not "needed", but it can be helpful. Twisting wires provides very effective defense against ambient electrical noise. Shielding just makes it better, especially at very high frequencies, where twisting becomes less effective. The best of course is to go balanced, twist it and shield it, but it involves more components in the output stage and that might reduce transparency. Shielded balanced connection, if properly done, has no shield to wires capacitance, since output is "floating" (not ground related). My Benchmark AHB2 power amp has only balanced input. Benchmark stated that 132dB S/N in this amp would be wasted with single ended input. On the other hand many people use single ended with very high quality gear and achieve great results.
Is an unshielded, unbalanced cable useful for anything in hifi? Where?
Is shielding needed? If it is, shouldn't we all be using balanced cables wherever possible? And yet, we hear that balanced connectors are only necessary, or usually even advisable, for long runs; that the added complexity may actually be inferior to an unbalanced cable in a typical 1 meter run, or run afoul of the particular implementation.
Is a cable "shielded" if it is coax, but the shield is used as the negative/ground (that is, connected/soldered to the plug at both ends?)
if a shield is tied to the negative wire at one end, isn't its capacitance "added" to the negative/ground wire, with potential deleterious effects?
Yes, I know someone will invariably respond with, "rely on your ears," or "use the Cable Company", but random trials at significant expense seems like a poor approach.
not trolling the great cable debate, just seeking some guidance on what to look for in cable design, if any is to be had.
3 responses Add your response