2. speakers
  3. 1211498409

has anybody heard Martinlogan w/ MIT?

So I'm back from a job in France where I had the pleasure of auditioning some of the finest Hi fi I have ever heard. LA has a long way to go to catch up with our European cousins! One place in particular, in Paris, had a killer demo with Martin Logan's, MIT and a stack of Krell components.
Ordinarily, I am not used to such a solid image or depth of image detail like these guys were getting from the ML's...... but man... they had it in spades! So, I bought their CD and after my return, I hurried home, sat down to my Krell, Martin Logan, Audioquest system, (Magnolia's best!) and the image is as flat as a pancake suspended between two huge speakers! I have moved them away from the wall into the room a bit more, but the tonal balance is becoming very lean and the size of the image is getting bigger, but less saturated. Everything I have tried so far (Monster AC Conditioning, ASC tube traps) is failing to create a believable image into my room. Next, I am going to try some MIT Cables (MH-750 Shotguns) I bought online for $500.00, so If this doesn't do it, I'm going to go back and check this system out again. From the notes I took, the speaker cables and interconnects that the Dealer used were MIT CVT 1, Hybrid Series. Since this last go, I have searched the web and can find nothing other than what MIT says about them. It would appear that they are so new that none are available used on the web yet. Has anyone heard these Hybrid cables? Do they create an Image like I describe? I am scheduled to return there next month, so I'm working hard to get a handle on this problem before I go back; because I know that if I don't fix it now, I'll probably succumb to purchasing the exact pair in the system! Anyone else know what I'm talking about?

Karl in a snarl....
karlstrauss
15 responses Add your response
sleepysurf
121 posts
 
I don't think the MIT cables are the missing link. It's more likely overall room acoustics and interaction with the speakers. Which ML's are you talking about? Besides pulling the speakers out from the wall, have you played around with toe-in, and tried various absorption/diffusion treatments in your listening room? You might want to post your quandary on... www.martinloganowners.com where there is a lot more ML setup experience.
mapman's avatar
mapman
21,951 posts
 
I've heard Krell and Marin Logan together and think I know the sound you are searching for, highly transparent and totally detached from the speakers in a way that kind of fills the room with sound.

Agreed most likely the room and/or its contents absorbing too much sound.

Set up a virtual system and post some pictures and I'm sure you'll get some good feedback from the knowledgeable folks on this site.

Your speakers are both connected to the amp properly and in phase, right?

Toe-in also worth playing with.

Cable tweaks don't sound likely to achieve what you're looking for.
merganser
216 posts
 
"I am not used to such a solid image or depth of image detail like these guys were getting from the ML's."

That's exactly what MIT cables will do.
snofun3
601 posts
 
Are paragraphs an endangered species? This is about the 10th thread lately that's unreadable without structure.

Why is this so difficult?
pops
2,273 posts
 
The MIT's are imaging/soundstaging champs especially in a 3D sense. Give them so playing time to open up and give yourself some time to acclimate and I'm betting it will help your cause.
jorgeparrapuppy
257 posts
 
Karl: Oddly enough, this was my first true all hi end set up. I had the Aerius i, the KAV300i, and MIT T2 speaker cables and (I think) the 330 interconnects, with the Pioneer PD65 feeding an Adcom 600 DAC. After some moving around of furniture and playing with speaker placement, the sound was transparent, indeed, and very satisfying. Bon chance!
objective1
95 posts
 
I would agree that the room is more at the core of your problem than the cables. This is assuming that you listened to the same speakers and electronics as that which you own.

I have Martin Logan ReQuests in my theater driven by a Krell frontend through Transparent Audio cabling (Ultra XL).

My room was initially untreated and the speakers were brassy and flat. Over the years I've both treated the room and advanced through a few different amp choices.

Treating the room made a huge difference. Moving from the Mark Levinson ML 334 to a Plinius SA 250 Mk IV made a noticeable difference to imaging and overall tonal quality. Recently i moved to a BAT VK250 with BAT Pak. That added a final three dimensionality that i didn't think could be attained.

The money i spent on treating the room easily had the largest return on investment. The amp tradeoffs were just icing on the cake.

I'd suggest two things...given all that :-)

Voice your room to determine optimal speaker locations. Use the Wilson Audio technique with a friend that has a good sense of hearing. (this is free)

Secondly, treat your room to manage side wall reflections, and bass absorption at room corners. Depending on how you watch for traps etc on the 'gon, you could do this for 2-3k$ and it will make your system sound like more than you paid for it. (as opposed to less than you paid for it)

Good luck.. this process is pretty fun. :-)
radrog
157 posts
 
Sounds to me it is a room problem. I have Krell-Martin Logan - MIT.
joey_v
653 posts
 
The beauty of Martin Logans (and stats) is their transparency to the source (aka upstream equipment). Most of the time, you're not listening to the speakers, but to the components behind it.

I would say that besides room interaction, if your system is not the same as the dealers, it may not just be the MIT cables that you're missing. Perhaps you have a Krell, but if it isn't the same stack as the one at the dealers - this could be 1 reason why you're not imaging as well.

What's your source player? How does it compare to the one at the dealer?

Joey
radrog
157 posts
 
I agree with JOEY V. That is why I purchased A aesthetix IO Signature. Just waiting to receive the unit. I am not quite sure how it is going to sound with solid state. But I am sure it is going to be better then me KPE Reference phono stage.
flrnlamb
508 posts
 
I think objective1 and sleepysurf are more on target here. I would FIRST learn how to setup up ONE SPEAKER AT A TIME in balance with your listening seat - then do the other! You really need to know if your fundamental basic setup is sound, or you WILL NOT achieve any kind of high fidelity sound quality! Of that, I assure you.
For setup, you are looking for flat response FIRST from each speaker from the listening possition.(might need help in your room, using something like Rives PARC, to smooth out the peaks) If these possitions happen to keep the speakers in proper distance with each other, your seat, you likely can get a strong immage. Then you play with toe-in, rack, aim, etc. Then, you deal with sidewall reflections (if you use the long-wall setup, you can often get away with sidewall treatment, as you sit closer to the speakers), then front and back wall reflections, and consider ceiling if you sit far back with low ceilings.
I would DEFINILTEY figure out what you are doing with speaker set up! - as your hinting that you simply move things around, without knowing what the response curve is doing (to your system's demise I might add...unless you get really lucky).
Too many people think the sound is all in the equipment. When reality is that it's at least 50% or more room, setup, acoustics, tweaking, EQ'ing, etc! So, don't forsake here.
ONLY after you're certain you have a solid fundamental setup, would I ever consider changing out something like an interconnnect or wires!!! That's the last of the tweaking - along with gear issolation tweaks, etc.
Good luck
mapman's avatar
mapman
21,951 posts
 
post some pictures of your room with current speaker location, ceiling hieght, etc. clearly depicted + then I think we can offer some more concrete suggestions regarding placement, etc.

Otherwise you could be playing musical speaker placements for quite a while.
radrog
157 posts
 
Ok time for me to answer your thread. MIT and Martinlogan excel at Imaging-Sound stage-Dynamics-3 dimensional - They lack in the Tonal department. But I am using KPE Reference Phono Stage and just waiting to receive my Aesthetic IO Signature. I am sure that will all change with the upgrade. The dealer told me I WILL BE PRESENTLY SURPRISED.

What sound are you looking to achieve?

Audioquest does not image well. They are known for there tonal ability.

One more thing. You need to purchase at-least in the Magnum line of cables to really see the benefit of MIT.
flrnlamb
508 posts
 
Actually, believe it or not, the top end Monster speaker wires are the ticket with the Logans! Dont' know why, but the Transparent, MIT, Harmonic Tech, Acoustic, etc, Ocos, etc, didn't sound anywhere near as well (for some strange reason) on thee Logans as the Monster!
We used to use this combo on all the Logans in our high end store for years, and with tremendous results (we sold a lot of Logans with this mariage).
MIT is too soft on top and mellow for the Logans.
My experience anyway.
radrog
157 posts
 
I agree also with Flrnlamb but MIT image very well. If you want my opinion AudioQuest is the cable I would go with if I could do it all over again.
Log in to respond
More to discover
80x80
Magico M6
80x80
Revel Ultima Salon 2
80x80
Klipsch Klipschorn AK6