Grade Master3 cartridge--Moving Iron Design

@bdp24 Glad to hear of the option for a line contact stylus with the Maroon. I lived happily with my Reference and Jubilee until I had to send my Reference back to John Wright for a rebuild. Learning that he was about to retire I started to explore other options hoping to find an MI cartridge that would sound like the Decca. I was surprised to find the MP-500 came closest. The Soundsmith cartridges I have are similar but praiseworthy for their own merits. The Grado Statement3 is the least like a Decca, to my ear.

I have never heard a Pickering or a Stanton. Nor any of the other now defunct MI cartridges.

Pickering and Stanton are MM, so far as I know. All of them.

I thought I had heard the term 'variable reluctance' applied to them? Which looks to me as if it a variant on the MI principle—see bottom right of this diagram from Gramophone in 1966:

Pickering is listed in the legend to your figure after point #2, as an example of "moving magnet". As I am sure you know, Pickering and Stanton were associated with each other. Most models of Pickering have a corresponding model among Stanton cartridges.  Both companies marketed a low output MM, the Stanton 980LZS (also the 981 variant) and the Pickering XVS7500. These have a much lower inductance and internal R than do the typical high output MMs from anywhere. It IS interesting so see illustrated the differences among MI, variable reluctance, and induced magnet (IM) types.  We usually don't bother to make a distinction among types 3, 4, and 5. For example, in this thread several refer to Decca as MI.

The drawing of the Decca/London pickup design on the new London site looks very similar to the drawing of the moving iron design in the Gramophone article. It’s the one in the upper right hand corner of fig. 2. The inclusion by the article’s author of the Decca in the variable reluctance category does not align with the description and drawing (bottom right corner) of a vr pickup in the article.