Grade Master3 cartridge--Moving Iron Design


Posting this because I just bought my first Grado cartridge since my entry level MM decades ago.I chose  the Master3 because it was highly rated and I was intrigued by the Jarrah Wood, boron cantilever and the nude elliptical stylus at a $1,000.00 price point. It's not the most expensive cartridge I have mounted on my VPI Signature table, but it has an excellent balance. Have run it about 20 hours now and it has settled in.

My question is the moving iron system is an excellent design and why haven't more manufacturers seen fit to utilize it?

mervo

Showing 4 responses by dogberry

Moving iron allows for the lowest mass on the cantilever of all three traditional classes, making the cartridges very lively and dynamic. Put enough turns on the fixed coils and you can have the advantages of high output too (a simpler phono stage and less tendency to hiss). Peter Ledermann has admitted he only makes low output MI cartridges so that buyers can use their expensive MC phono stages with them. Don't forget that SS, Grado and Nagaoka employ a traditional cartridge design, utilising iron or an alloy of it as the only moving mass on the proximal end of the cantilever, but if you go to an older arrangement, that of the Decca "tip-sensing" cartridges, it is the thin iron armature that is the only moving mass, and it replaces the cantilever altogether. This allows the lateral coil to encircle the base of the stylus:

 

and the vertical coil sits right on top of the end of the armature holding the stylus:

No wonder their owners love them! I am pretty much all in on MI cartridges, with three of my four regular use cartridges being of this type. The fourth is a mono MC, and I sometimes wonder about getting a London Decca Maroon mono to replace it, but it comes with a conical stylus.

 

This interview details the issue:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SHYUOV3_Fog

You never hear anything about it, but there is a special-order medium output (1.1mV) version of the Hyperion called the Helios.

@bdp24 Glad to hear of the option for a line contact stylus with the Maroon. I lived happily with my Reference and Jubilee until I had to send my Reference back to John Wright for a rebuild. Learning that he was about to retire I started to explore other options hoping to find an MI cartridge that would sound like the Decca. I was surprised to find the MP-500 came closest. The Soundsmith cartridges I have are similar but praiseworthy for their own merits. The Grado Statement3 is the least like a Decca, to my ear.

I have never heard a Pickering or a Stanton. Nor any of the other now defunct MI cartridges.

I thought I had heard the term 'variable reluctance' applied to them? Which looks to me as if it a variant on the MI principle—see bottom right of this diagram from Gramophone in 1966: