Does port location make a significant difference with regard to speaker placement?


Hi all, 

Pondering a speaker upgrade this fall, and with Axpona cancelled I am just going to head out and shop.  If I'm trying to "fix" anything with my current setup it might be some bass muddiness on certain tracks.  I could turn the Loudness off but why, LOL.....

Anyways, as I look for speakers am I expecting too much to say that moving from a rear ported speaker to a front/bottom ported speaker would be worth the effort to clean this up?  My speakers have decent proximity from walls and corners, but suspect I'm not perfect here.  I've also played with absorption behind speakers with some success, some failures.  

So looking for first hand experience in changing speakers and port locations, and the impact on sound, considering same speaker placement.  

Thanks in advance.  

EW
128x128mtbiker29

Showing 1 response by mijostyn

I essentially agree with clearthinker. Ports are a way of pushing the bass cut off a little lower at the expense of a much steeper cut off. I have never heard a ported loudspeaker produce what I consider to be accurate bass.
With todays high powered amplifiers,  DSP and the incredible drivers we have today you can make a sealed woofer/subwoofer do almost anything you want without any port noise. 
Clearthinker in my experience 30 Hz is asking a bit much of a panel speaker. I roll my Sound Labs off at 120 Hz to sealed subwoofers. The Sound Labs will go down to 40 Hz nicely if a bit on the lumpy side but removing the bass from them creates a large improvement in midrange and treble clarity not to mention headroom. How many ESLs have you seen do 110 dB without vaporizing? Another benefit is that distance from the front wall becomes less critical.