This is another attempt to create division in the Audio community. Why? because it creates more content. Physical media is my music playback choice. Streaming has a few years to go until it hits a level of refinement(SQ/etc.) that meets my standards. My main issue with streaming is 99%+ of music is unwanted why pay a service for a ,05% rented music play list. Many other time saving options exist for "finding" new music regardless of what year it was recorded. Music streaming(IMO) coincides with the cable channel flipper that wastes time sampling and finds nothing!
Do you agree with John Atkinson (and me)?
Point 1: In the recent thread entitled ’How much is too much to spend on a system?’, I contributed this comment: "The hi-fi shouldn’t be worth more than one’s music library." I said that half-jokingly, a wisecrack that I knew might be disagreed with.
Point 2: In the 1990’s I became a regular customer at the Tower Records Classical Music Annex store in Sherman Oaks, California. The store manager knew a LOT about Classical music, but also made no secret of his distain for audiophiles, whom he viewed as caring more about the sound quality of recordings than their musical quality.
Point 3: In the early days of The Absolute Sound magazine, the writers occasionally mocked audiophiles who had a serious high end system, but whose record collections merely consisted of a small number of "demo" discs. Those audiophiles collect records that make their systems sound good, rather than assemble a system that makes their records sound good.
I make the above points as a preamble to the following:
In the past few months I have fallen behind in my reading of the monthly issues of Stereophile that arrive in my mailbox. Yesterday I finally got around to reading the editorial in the January issue, written by John Atkinson (filling in for current editor Jim Austin, who is recuperating from surgery, I believe). The final two paragraphs of the editorial read as follows:
"Back in the day, I did an analysis of Stereophile reviewers’ systems. The common factor was that all the reviewers’ collections of LPs and CDs cost a lot more than their systems. The same is true of me, even in these days of streaming."
"Isn’t that the way it should be for all music-loving audiophiles?"
Well, is it?
- ...
- 60 posts total
@bdp24 A different approach to this question might be to ask, why do you still collect/purchase physical mediums in the age of streaming? I have not yet added streaming to my system. Partly because of the cost of components that would match the rest of my system, and partly because of my enjoyment of owning and being able to handle the product. While that will make zero sense to many, and I'm guessing all of the younger people getting into the audio hobby, it still works for me. A holdover from my youth? A case of OMS (old man syndrome)? |
We moved and not my gobs of records. (I kick myslf now) but the umpteen CD’s that came with are now back in boxes due to kick a** streaming. Now ah days/daze you CAN be an audiophile (better put have a wonderful sounding system ) with no physical media. Despite many well considered astutely written comments my pea brain comes up with remembering this poem The Mad Gardener’s Song
He thought he saw an Elephant, He thought he saw a Buffalo He thought he saw a Rattlesnake He thought he saw a Banker’s Clerk He thought he saw a Kangaroo He thought he saw a Coach-and-Four He thought he saw an Albatross He thought he saw a Garden-Door He thought he saw a Argument Lewis Carroll (1832-1898) |
Purchasing and using physical media is a commitment by the user. Streaming doesn't require that same level of emotional input. As an analogy: I go to a restaurant and order a steak. It looks great, smells wonderful and tastes like something from a dream. Or maybe I go to a butcher and buy me a slab of meat. I take it home, season it and then cook it until the smoke alarm goes off. Once I sit down to eat, the truth is, it doesn't taste any better than the restaurant fare, but it's a more satisfying meal anyway. You can choose from a menu or you can make a commitment. That's just my opinion and if you're happy, I'm happy too! |
Typical stereotype of audiophile is one who cares more about the equipment than music, and this proven by the value of their music collection vs equipment? Not saying this could be true in some cases, but what about the snobs I see proudly displaying their latest $1k or whatever rare box set or album, and then walls and walls of this proudly displayed behind them. Are these truly music lovers or are they simply like the collector of equipment who does likewise? Trying to generalize about this value differential simply doesn't likely apply to vast majority of audiophiles, at least audiophiles who got into this hobby/obsession to hear the music they love played with highest resolution/transparency. |
- 60 posts total