CJ's New ART88 Preamp

No doubt it is a great preamp as it is the replacement for the GAT II   At  $28000 , I’ll pass…..

Try the "Audio Shark" forums. The members tend to play at a much higher price level than are typically found here.

Hi GRK, Thanks

Just checked. Nothing there yet, but appreciate the help!

I just bought one to replace my GATII.  Listening to it as I write this note.  It is only 1 day old and in my experience will require at least 200 hours of break-in before meaningful listening will be instructive.  Right out of the box it sounds warmer than the GAT, but somewhat more restricted.  Smooth and quiet, but so was the GAT.  Amp is a c-j 27A, source at the moment is VPI HW40, SoundSmith Experion, phono stage is also c-j  TEA 1, series III, speakers are Sony SSAR2, subs are REL 212SX.  I will run the pre with my tuner 24/7 for a couple of weeks and then give it a critical listen.  Then write here again if there is interest.

Regards,

Bill

The first thing I heard on mine in the first 20 hours was the separation of instruments with each note seemingly hanging in space. I had broken in a GatS2 before that and this was different. 

It stayed like that pretty much till around the 200 hour mark when the sound filled out and became more dynamic. (I'm using a CJ ART150 stereo amp)

Would like to hear what you experience.   

+ I would like to hears thoughts also post run in….

I swapped the amp just weeks ago, trading my ART150 for the 27A, but had fully adjusted to the amp change using my GAT2 before deciding to order the ART 88.  But it is a lot of change in a relatively short few weeks.  I'll report back after break-in.  These things do need sufficient time for the caps to fully form.  This is my third:  ET5, GAT2 and now ART 88. 

Please consider this an early impressions report.  I might write again after more listening time.  First let me explain that I retired at the beginning of the Covid Pandemic with the result that my time with my GAT2 was quite extensive, definitely the most listening in my audiophile life which began in the mid-1960s.  I found the GAT2 very easy to listen to for long periods of time because it was very neutral, had no bad habits such as grain or noise and it had excellent delineation of detail without any discernable artiface.  The ART 88, adds considerably to these virtues, which is surprising to me.  First and most striking is that it displays a far greater sense of excitement.  There is just more impact imparted to each and every part of the entire audio spectrum.  Greater depth, starting in the lows, but really across the board.  Every note just seems to standout in relief.  The depth and feel, the richness of the sound is noticeable on every type of music:  Piano, strings, percussion, perhaps most of all on vocals.  I can't say the sound stage is wider or deeper, but it seems like each performer stands out in greater relief somehow.  I remember years ago shopping for pianos and hearing a profoundly good Model D Steinway and it just shook me up.  Goose bumps it sounded so good.  This ART 88 is like that.   The wow factor is off the charts.  To say I am delighted with my new ART 88 is an understatement.

Thanks billstevenson for your early impressions.   Exciting sounding preamp.  Longtime CJ preamp owner, currently using an ET5 but intrigued by the ART 88.

The ET5 is a wonderful preamp too.  I know because I had one for a couple of years.  Whereas the GAT2 was better, though, it offered incremental improvements in several ways over the ET5, the ART 88 is a much greater improvement over the GAT2.  I am listening to George Shearing accompany Carman McRae on an extraordinary Baldwin as I compose this note and I have to keep stopping to marvel at the quality of the reproduction on an old favorite record.  Earlier I listened to Ahmad Jamal and had the same reaction.  It is like I am hearing these recordings for the first time.