If your preamp is not balanced, it might start sliding and fall of the shelf so I would always go with a balanced one
Balanced vs RCA preamps
How important is it that your Pre-amp has both balanced and RCA capabilities? I’m shopping for another pre, most likely tube, and it seems to make sense with any future component that it offers both XLR and RCA. And to further complicate the search finding both these features plus remote limits the offerings for both tube and SS particularly tube.
- ...
- 73 posts total
Where did you get this from? Have you done your homework before taking 10 seconds to write this? Let me do some homework for you, and you can do the rest to see if you can find anything to support your false statement.
| |||||||||||||||
My preamp has both, XLR Lundahl balanced inputs transformers, since most Digital front ends are balanced ,then on the outputs RCA Because of Linear Tube Audio,originally Designed by David Berning with his unique Micro-Z-OTL output stage ,which the Vacuum tubes run much more efficient ,lower noise ,The team at LTA found over a few years to make it even better a Gen 2 Version , and use the Rays Select 6SN7 vacuum tubes , detailed a bit warmer , and the other tubes 12AT7 or 12AU7 which I am using with some Very rare Medical grade Telefunken tubes a great combo , + using 2 Hifi tuning Supreme CU- Copper Gold - 4 amp 20 mm slow blow fuses on back ,which VH Audio Carry. and as a good option ,and not too expensive a Hifi tuning Supreme Silver gold 20 mm 3.1 amp Fast blow on the main board with a AQ Tornado Source power cord ,Exceptional results and a who who of Excellent top notch parts quality which I know very well ,having 40+ years in Audio ,beating preamps at 2x the price $6350 Retail ,Mike at Audio Archon was very helpful , and fair-in pricing. | |||||||||||||||
@lanx0003 It is a fact in high end audio though that most producers of balanced line products pay no attention to AES48 (the balanced line standard), or the use of dBm levels (more later). That is part of the reason there is a balanced vs RCA debate. You have to be careful about things you read like the specs above! I own the two of the Topping DACs; The 40 Ohm value is actually the two 20 Ohm output impedances put in series when really they should be in parallel, which would be about 10 Ohms. WRT to the ARC stuff they are doing the same thing. FWIW ARC preamps in general tend to have high output impedances. IOW this is a nomenclature issue, not an output impedance issue. The standard for balanced line studio line level input impedance is 600 Ohms. Common accepted good design practice is that the circuit driving a load like that will have an output impedance about 1/10th of the load impedance. So we can assume that the source impedance will be 60 Ohms or less. That's a lot lower than most single-ended preamps... Balanced line levels are usually expressed in dBm. dBm is the VU reading you would get on a VU (Volume Unit) meter when the meter is across a 600 Ohm resistor. So its a measure of power; that requires the output impedance to be even lower. There are two levels that are standards in use: -4dBm and +10dBm; 0dBm is one milliwatt dissipated into a 600 Ohm load. My Neumann U67 microphones are designed to drive a 150 Ohm load. That implies an output impedance of 15 Ohms. Our MP-1 preamp can drive 600 Ohms directly at +10dBm despite using a vacuum tube output. This also suggests a low impedance and in fact they will drive 32 Ohm headphones. My old Ampex 351 studio tape machine was designed to drive 600 Ohms and also supported +10dBm. Most tube preamps will fall flat on their face trying to drive loads like that. In fact most solid state RCA preamps will too. My Otari MX70 1" tape machine has 600 Ohm inputs which expect at least -4dBm. You need a low impedance output to drive that. I designed the first balanced line preamp offered to high end audio back in the 1980s so yes, I researched this quite a lot prior to saying what I did
|
- 73 posts total