Audio Research LS28SE vs McIntosh C53


I have just been kicking around maybe trying another solid state pre-amp and have read some good reviews on the McIntosh C53. I have had the LS28SE for a few years and just curious if anyone has had an opportunity to make a fair comparison between the two. What would be lost and what would be gained? Also if someone has a solid state Pre that they have heard/own and experienced a comp between it and the LS28SE I would love to hear from you as well.

thank you

theo

The Audio Research is more evenly balanced with more detail. The Mac is a bit weightier sound. Definitely a preference thing. I would definitely listen to the Mac. My personal preference is definitely Audio Research. But there are lots of folks that like the Mac sound. Especially if rock music is your preferred fare. Also, if you have B&W speakers or Focal that have a hot top end, that can balance out the sound from Mac. 

I find AI does a pretty good job of contrasting sound:

The McIntosh C53 and Audio Research LS28SE offer distinct sonic signatures. The McIntosh is known for its slightly more mid-rangey sound with a noticeable lack of treble detail, while the Audio Research is described as more detailed and punchy across the entire frequency spectrum, with a particularly strong high-end. Some listeners find the Audio Research to be more "effortless" and revealing of the full sonic landscape. 

McIntosh C53:

  • Sound Signature: Characterized as slightly mid-rangey and lacking in treble detail. 
  • Overall Impression: Some describe the C53 as "well-behaved" and offering "fantastic sound quality" for its price point, according to a review by McIntosh
  • Strengths: May be preferred by listeners who appreciate a warmer, more forgiving sound signature, especially those who may be sensitive to bright highs. 

Audio Research LS28SE:

  • Sound Signature:

    Described as more detailed, punchy, and having a wider frequency response, particularly in the treble region. 

  • Overall Impression:

    Often praised for its refined and textured sound, with a particular focus on clarity and transparency in the higher frequencies. 

  • Strengths:

    May be preferred by listeners who value a more neutral and detailed sound, with strong imaging and separation. 

In Summary:

The choice between the two depends on personal preference. If you prioritize a warmer, slightly less demanding sound with good mids, the McIntosh C53 might be suitable. If you prefer a more detailed, punchy, and neutral sound with excellent high-end extension, the Audio Research LS28SE might be the better choice. 

ghdprentice, thank you for your very informative response. I have had McIntosh preamps although the last 3 were pre-pro. I have had 3 AR pre amps now and I do really like the LS28SE currently in my system. A recent bout with tube failure at 1900 hours caused some frustration in pinpointing the problem and seeking the resolution, which at AR’s advice was to replace 2 of the tubes and if not resolved to replace the other 2. 
And I am sure that this is probably a character flaw, but every now and then I think I hear the problem. Which makes me think must I replace more tube, I only use these from AR, but the expense concern plays a weighted factor. 
So the question pops in my mind, maybe simplify, and return to solid state. I don’t have to go with McIntosh, but at my age and being retired, long term solutions play a huge part. Preferably I would keep my system as is and use the money on other ideas I have. 
but your advice is good, I need to to the dealer where I  purchases my speakers, Sonus Faber, as they are a McIntosh dealer as well. He does push the Simm products, how ever with tariffs I think that has escalated the investment. 
 

thanks again 

Theo

IMO it boils down to personal preference. What does your ear tell you?

ARC makes the finest preamps in the world in many studied pro's opinion. 

MAC has a warm, engaging "house sound" that has been carefully curated over decades. 

Which music you listen to most and which speakers you drive are major factors in the sound signature you want. 

While I am biased toward ARC I have heard some really magical MAC rigs. To be honest I'd like to add a MAC integrated driving a set of Maggie 1.7x to my small room system- even though my big rig is ARC pre-and power amp'd and it thrills me again and again. 

Theo, why not wait to hear the new Audio Research LS2 solid state preamp that has just been announced? The sound may be closer to your LS28E.

 

George, thanks for the demonstration of what AI can provide for us audiophiles!