55” or 65” TV Screen Size and Your Speakers: Please Join Survey


 

With my two-way speaker build on hold as the clock ticks towards December 31st when my $1200.00 in Sony card points expire, I am struggling to decide between the 55” or 65” Sony A95L OLED TV. Sitting on chairs at Best Buy, I tape measured 11 ft from the 55”, which looked small, while the 65” looked too big at the same distance.

 

My largely empty living room is 20 ft x 11, with the west side open, crossing a 4 ft wide x 27 ft hallway and into a ~ 10 ft x 9 kitchen and then 3 ft wide staircase. A triangular ceiling that peaks at 11 ft is above it all.   

 

I plan to listen 10 ft from my speakers, with the TV between them and a foot or so behind the horns.

 

I built the 65” (56.9” w x 33” h) cardboard mock and to my eyes at 12 ft the 65” “screen” looks immersive.  

 

I will build the 55” (48.25” x 27.5”) mock as soon as I can get more cardboard from the local supermarket.

 

Meanwhile, it might be very helpful to learn of the experiences of other 55” and 65” TV users.

 

How far are you from one of those screen sizes?  

 

Do you sit on a chair or recliner?

 

Please describe the speakers that you use in place of the TV’s internal speakers, and how far you sit from them.

 

 

ajant

@waytoomuchstuff, the Kloss Novabeam! I have fond memories of sitting in our basement, watching Star Wars on laserdisc in front of that big silver screen and thinking "it will never get better than this". Of course, at 13 years old, everything seems that way!

Every time I catch a faint whiff of heated electronics it takes me back to that experience.

@ajant - one more add to the go bigger list. If you like the impact that a movie theatre screenscape gives you, the distance from the most popular seats in any movie house as a ratio of the diagonal dimension of the screen ranges between 1:1 to 1:1.5 - this is a whole lot closer than most people sit to their tv screens at home. If you have access to high resolution film, a larger screen gives impact like nothing else. I have a room large enough that my viewing position is not constrained. I have an 85incher coupled with a room corrective sennheiser ambeo max and my face is about seven feet from the screen. I could use more speakers for a more immersive effect, but movie sound for me is way less important than my two channel audio. The combination of 85inches, seven feet and sennheiser is amazing : )

In friendship - kevin

Definitely 65".  I have two of those in the house plus a 110" motorized drop down screen.

I sit about 12 ft. from our TV in a stressless chair. We had a 55 inch but went to a 65 inch. No looking back, the 65 inch is a great size and doesn’t overwhelm the room. The 65 inch would work very well. If you look at the "recommended" viewing guide charts for TV viewing they would probably say a 75 inch would be recommended depending on the content resolution.  I ditched our receiver and 5.1  setup and went with an upper end samsung sound bar side/rear speakers and subwoofer.  It was better integration and actual sound.  After all it's only TV since we have a dedicated 2 channel room

I’m barely 8’ from my 65” screen. My best tv is a 55” Oled in the bedroom. I don’t do surround sound anymore because the living room size has gotten much smaller. I miss the days of having a 20x25’ room. Those days are long gone. 
 

I wouldn’t buy anything less than a 65” screen nowadays. And is it me or the screens have gotten smaller. My 65” screen is nearly as big as today’s 75” screen. What’s up with that?