timeltel
Responses from timeltel
| Who needs a MM cartridge type when we have MC? Regards, Raul: Difference is implied. http://forum.audiogon.com/cgi-bin/fr.pl?eanlg&1245595534&&&/Killing-sibilance-distortion-VPI-Jubilee&&st50Page two is exceptionally good reading.Peace, | |
| Who needs a MM cartridge type when we have MC? Regards, Nandric: LOL, glad to see the "Balkan" humor intact. 30% Fiat accompli? How to double the value of your Yugo--- Fill it with gas. (GRIN)Peace, | |
| Who needs a MM cartridge type when we have MC? Regards, Nandric: Nikola, you've introduced a marvelous topic. Relax, it's no longer P. C. to shoot the messenger. Referring back to our brothers at Lenco Heaven and the comments from the very competent Reto:"Shiga had established, that by a given... | |
| Who needs a MM cartridge type when we have MC? Regards, Fleib, Griffithds. Don, congratulations on the Astatic.Fleib/Don: As an inveterate stylus-cart swapper and well aware of the influences of loading as well as the effect of cantilever damping, a personal preference for carts with an output... | |
| Who needs a MM cartridge type when we have MC? Regards, Fleib: Wow, burr under the old saddle? Feel better now?I have a personal negative response to the 440MLa, which is similar to most carts with more than 2600 Ohm output impedance: Bright mids and hfs bordering on glassy. The ML stylus/reso... | |
| Who needs a MM cartridge type when we have MC? Regards, Anyone? Easy to understand: http://www.rense.com/products/AboutFreque-08.pdf"The “1’st” Harmonic is the actual fundamental frequency itself. The “2’nd” Harmonic is a frequency that is twice as large as the fundamental frequency. The “3’rd... | |
| Who needs a MM cartridge type when we have MC? Raul, by your fervorThere's reason to be impressed. Let's not forget subsonic bass,It's foundation for the rest.But it's not heard said Dlaloum moreWatching as silent bass danced the chair, And backed the nails out from the floor. But we do know D... | |
| Turntable speed accuracy Regards, Catastrofe. Reverse your order of operation: 60/33.3 = 1.8.Peace, | |
| Who needs a MM cartridge type when we have MC? Regars, Dlaloum: You posed: "none of these research articles have identified is what the mechanism whereby we sense the HF". Easy answer, so easy you'll rap yourself on the head. When you do you'll sense the sound predominately through the bone st... | |
| Who needs a MM cartridge type when we have MC? Regards, Dlaloum: Re. the 440MLa: Loading plugs have been considered. The 440s' stylus is good on any of the lower output impedance Signet/AT carts.To your interest (and any others), the influence of UHF on the perceptions would seem to have commo... | |
| Who needs a MM cartridge type when we have MC? Regards, Nikola: There are some carts that are excessively analytical, IMHO the AT440MLa is one, loss of cohesion results. For me, anyway. Excessive detail results in distraction and basic pleasure found in the flow of the performance as a united ... | |
| Who needs a MM cartridge type when we have MC? Regards, Travbrow. Re; the EPC-102SP. Historically, single play means in a manual fashion, as opposed to stacking lps on a changer. As always, enjoying a good mystery. Do you have a new TA (Moerch DP-4)? If so how's it doing & always good to h... | |
| Who needs a MM cartridge type when we have MC? Regards, Raul: And thanks for the add'l info. The description reads "Top" cart, nice ellipt. stylus & beryllium cantilever, output same as the EPC-100s. Not in the market for another cart right now (esp. one I'm unfamiliar with) so I'll take y... | |
| Who needs a MM cartridge type when we have MC? EPC-102SP offered on Agon, someone please buy it. | |
| Who needs a MM cartridge type when we have MC? Regards, Nandric, Pryso: Attributed to L.H. member "Analogfuture": "Back in the 1990s I read with great interest a couple of articles by Reto Luigi Andreoli, in "HiFi Scene Schweiz" ("The Truth about Cartridge Sound" etc.), where, after a thorough... |