kota1
Responses from kota1
| Do YOU have a flat frequency response in your room? @asvjerry @nonoise Thanks for catching my typo, that should read. There is no "wrong" way to do this hobby @asvjerry You obviously get the point, congrats on the speaker build, must be nice to have the satisfaction of being able to literally ... | |
| Nearly all manufacturers do not advertise/exhibit their product measurements? Why? Another point of view on th GR Research power cord from our member @abdodson I put the first one on the amp. It replaced a similarly priced well regarded cable. No contest. More air, better separation, more dynamic. Across the board better, sign... | |
| Do YOU have a flat frequency response in your room? @nonoise +1, hey, there is "wrong" way to do this hobby as long as you get what you want. My post was directed at the members posting that they don't have what they want, and asking what to buy/try next. I think that this is what people who are n... | |
| Do YOU have a flat frequency response in your room? @mrskeptic , that statement is based on the research paper I posted on page 1: Flat on-axis frequency response is clearly the engineering objective for most of these systems. Those that deviate significantly earn lower ratings in double-blind sub... | |
| Do YOU have a flat frequency response in your room? @wturkey , I am not a quant, we had quants in another thread, that take it to the ridiculous, | |
| Pleasurably better, not measurably better I do both measurably and pleasurably better. First I made the room measurably better. Then I added immersive audio capabilities for pleasurably better. Depending on the source and the recording I can "increase" the pleasure of the music by changin... | |
| Pleasurably better, not measurably better @erik_squires @cd318 , +1 on ceiling absorbers. I have absorption panels on the ceiling in the front 1/3 of my room (you can see them a bit in the photo in my profile) and I use Auralex Geofusors back filled with absorption (polyfil) so they d... | |
| Do YOU have a flat frequency response in your room? @tomic601 , to answer your question see the white paper I posted earlier in this thread. From "The Measurement and Calibration of Sound Reproducing Systems-1. Introduction" | |
| Do YOU have a flat frequency response in your room? @wturkey and , you can check the measurements of my room in my profile. | |
| Do YOU have a flat frequency response in your room? @jeffrey75 , please post any links you would like to house curves. I think @mikelavigne rephrased the question properly, it is to get the FQ that is desired, but that doesn't mean it has to be flat. I am saying that listeners are better off getti... | |
| Do YOU have a flat frequency response in your room? @erik_squires , wow +10, nice article. I hope the other people reading this thread benefit from your wisdom here. This proves a point I keep repeating: You have no idea what the lower cutoff of a speaker in a room actually is until you measure i... | |
| Do YOU have a flat frequency response in your room? The pro version of Audyssey let’s you use 100% custom curves, the upgrade license is $200 and a calibrated mic about $50. Anyone with a D&M product that is able to use the $20 app can get a trial version of it at the Microsoft store. | |
| Do YOU have a flat frequency response in your room? @erik_squires , nice job on the attention to detail :) I was using audyssey and it was better than nothing. Then I used the room treatment method that Anthony Grimani discusses in that video I posted earlier and it was infinitely better. Got my M... | |
| Room correction room system vs ears…. @fleschler I look forward to more pics and if you have time the FR graphs. Would be very interesting to see before and after FR curves with the HFT system. | |
| Room correction room system vs ears…. @fthompson251 +1 |