hfisher3380
Responses from hfisher3380
| Should Sound Quality of Computer Audio be improved I think timlub hit the nail on the head - Petty give the impression of arguing for the sake of arguing. What's that that someone said on an earlier page about reminding him of an ex-wife...? | |
| Should Sound Quality of Computer Audio be improved Petty, I don't think any reasonable person wants to deny you anything. Who here has any interest in killing off any format? Most of us pick our format(s) and get on with it. Personally, I've given up on SACD. I currently use vinyl, CD (ripped to m... | |
| 10K$ Speakers for 845 SET amplification Coincident speakers sound GREAT with SET amps - that's why I own a pair. | |
| Should Sound Quality of Computer Audio be improved Is it heartless on my part that I enjoy watching Petty's outbursts get more and more ludicrous as his feeble arguments go up in flames? Kinda like watching people self-destruct on those old reality shows.So let me get this straight...first it's "l... | |
| Should Sound Quality of Computer Audio be improved Um - who said sampling rate doesn't matter? I believe that what was actually said is that the recording quality and technique matters more - which is absolutely true in my experience. While higher resolution recordings do sound better in general, ... | |
| Should Sound Quality of Computer Audio be improved Petty, Petty, Petty...your latest diatribe is just more twisted logic. We are no more be blamed for the failures of SACD/DVDa than we are for the failure of 8-track or Beta. If enough people don't buy into a format, the format fails, pure and simp... | |
| Should Sound Quality of Computer Audio be improved Ivan - computer audio ain't for everyone - it most definitely is not plug and play if you want to do it right - at least in my opinion. In this area I would admit that Pettyofficer does have a point - there is some effort required to reap the bene... | |
| Should Sound Quality of Computer Audio be improved Oh give me a break Petty - just when I think you're verging on a breakthrough and making a bit of sense you start talking in circles again. Obviously a better master will lead to better sound quality - no matter what the format. You have to look n... | |
| Should Sound Quality of Computer Audio be improved Ivan, "audio-only" computers already exist. See Linn Akurate and Bryston BDP-1, amongst others. However, it is not that difficult to gather info on the net about optimizing your own off-the-shelf computer system for server use. Most of us who freq... | |
| Should Sound Quality of Computer Audio be improved Even if a recording is mastered in 32 bit, once you hear it on a redbook CD player you are hearing it in 16/44. That's just the way it is, Petty - that's the technology.On the other hand, it is possible to hear such a recording in its native resol... | |
| Should Sound Quality of Computer Audio be improved Wow Petty - looks like the light bulb finally came on. No reasonable person is trying to wipe out any format. Whether or not I listen to SACD I derive absolutely no benefit from it being wiped off the face of the earth. I do believe that eventuall... | |
| Should Sound Quality of Computer Audio be improved So what Petty - what of all the studios that record in 24/192 and downsample to the 16/44 on your CDs? Somewhere in your latest wandering diatribe there must be a point. | |
| Should Sound Quality of Computer Audio be improved Good points yet again Chadeffect - which will come to no avail. When in doubt, refer to the original question in the thread - "should sound quality of computer audio be improved"? The answer is actually quite simple - YES!! Sound quality of every ... | |
| Should Sound Quality of Computer Audio be improved "Can we end this Thread now? It no longer serves any purpose". Another threat? Impending doom? LOL!!! | |
| Should Sound Quality of Computer Audio be improved Petty Officer "threatening" to back out of the dialogue! LOL! What ever are we going to do!?!? |