geoffkait
Responses from geoffkait
| On hearing and listening. I believe listening and hearing are really the same thing for most people who use the words. It’s just a semantics game to try to separate them. The word Perception also is essentially the same thing as hearing and listening. Having said that, a l... | |
| Interconnect Directionality jea48, unless I miss my guess Herman, the person you quoted in your last post, is as confused as a puppy dog meeting his first female puppy about the whole subject of electricity, current and the electromagnetic signal and the fields involved. In ... | |
| Interconnect Directionality ahofer, so I assume you don’t actually have any kind of theory and just like flapping your gums. 😬 | |
| Interconnect Directionality Well, not you, specifically. It’s the editorial “we.” 😬 At this point in time I’m just being Devil’s advocate. | |
| Interconnect Directionality OK, here we go! The MAGNETIC 🧲 FIELD induced by current traveling through wire is located outside the conductor. Inside the conductor the flux density of the MAGNETIC 🧲 FIELD is zero. The ELECTRIC ⚡️FIELD portion of the ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVE is ort... | |
| High value, giant killer speakers? Uh, it’s not really the speakers, it’s the SYSTEM. Hel-loo! And the best SYSTEM I’ve heard (by about a light year) is just a couple Metro stops away. Hurray for me! 🤗 | |
| Interconnect Directionality You’re supposed to pick a theory and support it. You can’t have it both ways. I’m willing to listen to any theory regarding the general subject of electricity in wires, how the EM wave can be distorted and wire directionality. I’m willing to liste... | |
| Interconnect Directionality We are beyond that. I just got through pointing out (get it? Pointing?) 😛 the location and direction of Poynting vectors ☝️ in a copper wire are irrelevant to wire directionality arguments. The next thing you know they’ll be saying all wire sounds... | |
| Interconnect Directionality It actually makes no difference to the argument for wire directionality whether the “energy” of the electromagnetic wave EM travels inside the conductor or outside the conductor. The Poynting vectors argument is a red herring. This is because the ... | |
| Interconnect Directionality What about this? What about that? Who am I, Dr. Know? | |
| Interconnect Directionality We already know that wire directionality is real and that it’s audible. So, obviously the signal must be traveling inside the copper, not outside the copper. Some portion of the signal may be traveling near the surface. Polishing the surface of th... | |
| Interconnect Directionality Relax. There is no paradox. The copper has the necessary free electrons, not the air or the dielectric material. We know photons can travel through solid material. X-Rays, radio waves and Gamma rays are well-known examples. So it’s not as if it’s ... | |
| Interconnect Directionality If the electromagnetic wave (signal) is comprised of photons AND the electromagnetic wave is carried by free electrons in the copper then doesn’t it make sense that the photons must be traveling through the copper? We know certain electrical and m... | |
| BEST FEMALE VOCAL EVER Melanie | |
| Ears hurt when listening after changing speakers Uh, the plot thickens. 😬 |