dimitry
Responses from dimitry
| Who needs a MM cartridge type when we have MC? Excellent advice on the AT line!I usually cant afford the VERY best, so I purchased AT33e MC and AT140lc MM. The first one is excellent and the MM just got here.With the Biotracer arms, cartridge exchange takes about 30 seconds, so I have been lis... | |
| Who needs a MM cartridge type when we have MC? Victor X-1iie arrived, courtesy of Chakster-Misha, and I am very impressed with this cartridge! Very little/nothing to fault, great clarity, dynamics and harmonic purity - similar, in my system, to the very best from Technics of the same time peri... | |
| Who needs a MM cartridge type when we have MC? Thank you, Nandric-Nikola for an excellent sample of Stanton 980 cartridge! It is a truly unique MM/MC hybrid and it will serve well in my small collection! | |
| Who needs a MM cartridge type when we have MC? Thank you for advice! I noticed that modern MP cartridged have a rather uninspiring diamond (0.4 x 0.7), untill one gets to the 500 model. Any thoughts from the group? | |
| Who needs a MM cartridge type when we have MC? Thank you all for good advice! As I build out my modest MM/MI collection I need advice on the Osawa/Nagaoka line. Should I go after a modern MP-500 or are there vintage models I should investigate? I liked what I heard from OS-101, though with a s... | |
| Who needs a MM cartridge type when we have MC? Now that I have a table that makes cartridge changes easy (Sony PS-B80), I am adding to my collection. I am interested in finding a Stanton 981 lzs - it seems to be an interesting and unique "hybrid" design. Does anyone know of a source? | |
| Who needs a MM cartridge type when we have MC? And by a messiah complex, perhaps? | |
| Who needs a MM cartridge type when we have MC? Hey dont mess with Raul!He is da BOSS, and several of us are estupido!Know your place. | |
| Who needs a MM cartridge type when we have MC? Raul,Lots more electrons. The message is slightly different: it is the people who refuse TO AGREE with you that are "estupido." And who can blame you? You clearly told them you are right and still, they dont agree! The only pissible explanation - ... | |
| Who needs a MM cartridge type when we have MC? Raul, you spend a lot of electrons, but the content is simple - you consider people who disagree with you to have low intellect, which is the actual definition of stupid - estupido in Spanish.But the people you call stupid aren't really that - the... | |
| Who needs a MM cartridge type when we have MC? There are lots of induced magnet systems out there - Stanton, Grado, Bang and Olufsen, Glanz and many others. ADC is certainly not unique in devising a magnetic circuit different from the standard moving magnet designs. I enjoy my ADC and other br... | |
| Who needs a MM cartridge type when we have MC? I see someone is removing perfectly reasonable posts...Who might that be? | |
| Who needs a MM cartridge type when we have MC? Raul,So, if you postulate that small difference in generators are very important and we should focus on them (and if you are correct), then there must be something truly special and unique in the standard ADC’s generator that makes it "the best of... | |
| Who needs a MM cartridge type when we have MC? The obvious answer, Raul, is that the junky ADC is very synergistic with your particular system. Many others may find it very ordinary or worse. | |
| Who needs a MM cartridge type when we have MC? The fact that there are variations in specifications between Glanz and Astatic Mitachi variants is very little reason to assert major generator differences.Consider, for example. the Stanton catalog that is available online from the Library of Con... |