atdavid
Responses from atdavid
| Romex to your amp? The Authority having Jurisdiction, ultimately the local government often passes laws/bylaws that accept in full the NEC. They have to to have legal authority to enforce compliance. Lack of compliance is a civil violation not criminal but you are s... | |
| How Science Got Sound Wrong Oh Cleeds you totally crack me up. You 100% believe that every specification w.r.t. turntables and vinyl 100% correlates to our understanding of human hearing but you will jump through logical hoops and distort math, physics and reality in an atte... | |
| Has to be said This thread is a giant exercise in Corellation does not equal Causation. | |
| Has to be said It is not remotely the same as a CD transport where the light frequency is defined by the laser not the cavity as with Schuman resonance frequency. | |
| Has to be said E = hf, where h = Planck constant, f = frequency.The laser light photons are much more energetic than the Schuman resonance photons and the low frequency photons for submarine communication are also low energy. | |
| New Omega E Mat from Perfect Path Technologies I am leaning towards psychotropic drug delivered via contact, possibly through environmental release. Forget this whole EMI theory. | |
| How Science Got Sound Wrong And I shall hereby dub you "DetachmentFromRealityist". If you want to use childish names, lets go all in.This notion that we cannot measure electrical signals with enough detail to match human human is false. It is not a supportable position. To ... | |
| How Science Got Sound Wrong Sticks and stones may break my bones, but calling names just shows your bias (and is a bit childish).I have heard great turntables. I have heard great turntables sound great. I have heard great turntables "stumble" ... or maybe it was the pressing... | |
| New Omega E Mat from Perfect Path Technologies Arguably in today's parlance, virtual photons. Time to update your QM knowledge. It's all theoretical at this point anyway.geoffkait18,729 posts12-05-2019 4:33pm>>>>They are real photons. You know, like X-rays and gamma rays and microw... | |
| How Science Got Sound Wrong It is a burden. | |
| How Science Got Sound Wrong For you, two bits! I thought it was pretty self explanatory though.>>>>>>Is there any compensation for translating that paragraph? | |
| How Science Got Sound Wrong Unless the compression takes into account equal loudness contours to target a more idealized playback at typical volume levels. The dynamic range database does not consider spectrum.geoffkait18,721 posts12-05-2019 5:00pmThere is no advantage to ov... | |
| How Science Got Sound Wrong You can spend all the money and the world and ... the channel separation will still suck as it is inherent in the implementation, you will never have de-equalization perfect since you don't know the exact equalization curve, you can't fix wow/flut... | |
| How Science Got Sound Wrong You are referring to something that some people actual like ... whether we do or not.geoffkait18,710 posts12-05-2019 10:11amatdavid, You appear to be blissfully ignorant of the Loudness Wars. But that’s OK, it’s a common newbie mistake. What I’m... | |
| How Science Got Sound Wrong Contrary to uninformed belief, dynamic compression started before CDs. CDs simply provided a vehicle, because of their lack of restrictions on whole album dynamic range, to make it even louder. Apparently there are people in this world who find vi... |