Sticks and stones may break my bones, but calling names just shows your bias (and is a bit childish).
I have heard great turntables. I have heard great turntables sound great. I have heard great turntables "stumble" ... or maybe it was the pressing? I have heard them "color" the sound. That is completely okay. Some people's favourite color is blue. Some people's favourite color is red. No matter how much anyone screams, blue light will be shorter wavelength that red.
I never made an anti-LP argument, I just pointed out the many ways that LPs are not and cannot be accurate. I do that when someone claims technical superiority of vinyl. If you want to say it sounds better to you, I have no issues with that. There is a cross-section of the population that prefer the sound. If you want to claim it has technical merits it does not possess, then I am going to call that out. That is not being biased, that is being honest.
I listen to a lot of live music, both amplified and not. I like live music, warts and all. I like music recorded in a studio too, which is most. I don't find vinyl brings me any closer to some "live" nirvana. I am not oblivious to vinyl mixes often being better, but I don't say that is because of "vinyl", it is because of mixing.
cleeds2,610 posts12-06-2019 9:18amIt’s
clear where you’re coming from - you’re a measurmentalist. You are so
absorbed and infatuated with numbers and graphs that should you listen
to even an extraordinarily outstanding turntable system, your profound
confirmation bias would prevent you from enjoying the sound. For you, LP
will always be a pig.
That’s a fine preference to have, by the
way, and you have a lot of good company! But I’m glad that I can enjoy
music from a variety of sources.
Your anti-LP argument is filled
with illogic, btw, but no matter. A preference is just that - it doesn’t
require any elaborate explanation to justify it.