Componets first, cables second?


I often hear about the improvements cables have made to systems, whether IC or speaker cables. Then IK hear the advice, buy the best components you can afford and upgrade cables along the way.

What I am wondering is is it, buy the best compnents you can afford and worry about cables later on down the road, or is it, a balance between the two to achieve the sound one is after?

For xample, to be more concrete, should I buy a better CDP and sacrifice on the cabling or should I buy a more moderate CDP and get a high quality cable?

Any expereince/advice is welcome
Cheers
mariasplunge
I guess ultimately what I am getting at here ( and it is good to hear all these opinions) is in my process of upgrading and budgeting how much should I put aside for cabling?

Of course that is impossible for anyone here to answer except myself. But the way I see it now is putting down a signifigant chunk of change for a choice component and then slowly upgrading cables might be wisr than splitting the difference. Sure i could buy a set of steath indra's but then my cdp might end up costing equal to or less than the cables.
So do have the cables cost a third of my player, a quarter, less? Or do I go all out, for a component, throw in a 100-200 dollar pair of cables and worry about upgrading later?

Maybe this line of thinking is like trying to put holes in swiss cheese...or something like that
Peter, there is no one right answer here. Shardone, no, you are not wrong, as this is not a right or wrong, black or white area. Things audio are never that simple.

Peter, I would just go out and buy the best component you like now, that is the priority. Worry about the cables later. Cables are more for fine tuning in a system's synergy. Certainly a fine tuned system will sound better than a collection of expensive gear. However, that takes time. You need to start with the components, then find cables that make them sing together. You cannot choose the cables first and then try to find components that mesh with them. My only comment is to not spend so much on components that you never address the cables. A well balanced system is just that, well balanced. You may find a great cable for little $$$, you may also find a great component for little $$$.

There are no magic solutions, no shortcuts. No one here can tell you what components or cables that you will like. No one can tell you how much you should spend on any one item. It's trial and error. You just have to do some of the experiments yourself, using your room and your ears. Sorry.....that's just the way it is.

Remember, the journey IS the adventure.

Enjoy!

John
Pretty funny Shadorne for a guy with two systems primarily made up of consumer electronics...

I would hear no difference in cabling with those components either...

I have no way of knowing, but how good is your hearing? You have perfect pitch ???
It is very seldom that the cables cost as much,or more than the component.There are exceptions.Though I must admit that the cables I use are not cheap,but as I down-graded I kept the original cables.I guess it may depend on whether you are on the way up or down.They say you meet the same people on the way up ,as you do on the way down.
I guess ultimately what I am getting at here ( and it is good to hear all these opinions) is in my process of upgrading and budgeting how much should I put aside for cabling?

Of course that is impossible for anyone here to answer except myself. But the way I see it now is putting down a signifigant chunk of change for a choice component and then slowly upgrading cables might be wisr than splitting the difference. Sure i could buy a set of steath indra's but then my cdp might end up costing equal to or less than the cables.
So do have the cables cost a third of my player, a quarter, less? Or do I go all out, for a component, throw in a 100-200 dollar pair of cables and worry about upgrading later?

Maybe this line of thinking is like trying to put holes in swiss cheese...or something like that