AT-OC9XMLvs AT-OC9XSH


Any experience comparing these carts?  Is there really a difference in stylus shape between the two?  

I have owned a few OC9ML and was not disappointed.  

I'm looking for a new cart coming off of a Lyra Skala and don't expect quite that refinement but would like equal or improved dynamics.  Also looking for solid imaging and a good soundstage.

Arm is a Jelco TK-850L on a severely modified VPI TNT.  All Herron Audio electronics.  

bpoletti

If the phono stage has sufficient gain, I would dare say the ART7 even at $1090 is a good bargain, if one is looking for a LOMC cartridge. And it's likely to outperform the OC9 variants. The price is about the same as that of a Nagaoka MP500 (high output moving iron). I happen to have one of each up and running right now in my "upstairs" system, which means I like both although I would say the MP500 is a bit "fuller"  or richer sounding, and the ART7 perhaps more detailed. These differences are nothing to write home about; they are both excellent.

Post removed 

Viridian, that $500-$600 price is doable if you buy from Japan, and that’s about what I paid for mine a year ago in Tokyo. I was assuming that most would buy in the US where I think the price is more like $ 900, within shouting distance of the ART7 from LP Gear. And anyway, the OP is interested in a new LOMC, apparently not in a high output MI. 

Post removed 

I am not interested in moving iron / moving magnet carts.  My listening preferences are strongly in favor of LOMC carts.  My Herron VTPH-2a works GREAT with LOMC carts even though it also is outstanding with HOMC carts.  

The ART7 sounds interesting, but I have concerns about its very low output of 0.12mv.  Not sure how that would work with the Herron phono stage.  I have more gain available with the Herron VTSP-3a(r03).

More to discover