This has been discussed ad nauseum here on Audiogon. Low impedances can lower sensitivity which can make amps work harder to produce power and increase amp distortions. The degree to which the amp distorts due to this depends on the stoutness of the amp. The greater the loudspeakers sensitivity the more likely it will be a more open gateway to what distortions are still presented by upstream components, including but not limited from the amp. What is often less discussed is that varying impedances can strain amps too, and is more likely to present difficult phase angles to the amp as well. It is far easier to present and maintain a steady impedance by lowering the impedance of loudspeaker than visa versa. Electro-mechanical components are much more difficult to make perform well than purely electrical components. The variance between loudspeakers is typically much greater than between decently designed amps. This might suggest that more leaway be given to loudpspeakers than amps. As has previously (and wisely) suggested here; speakers designers have to choose what paramters and associated compromises combine to best meet ultimate design goals. Some if not most of the best measuring loudpseakers have lower impedances, and ergo lower sensitivity. There are a bountiful number of well designed amps that can handle such loads with minimal consequence.
How important is the efficiency of a speaker to you?
I went to an audio meeting recently and heard a couple of good sounding speakers. These speakers were not inexpensive and were well built. Problem is that they also require a very large ss amp upstream to drive them. Something that can push a lot of current, which pretty much rules out most low-mid ( maybe even high) powered tube amps. When I mentioned this to the person doing the demo, i was basically belittled, as he felt that the efficiency of a speaker is pretty much irrelevant ( well he would, as he is trying to sell these speakers). The speaker line is fairly well known to drop down to a very low impedance level in the bass regions. This requires an amp that is going to be $$$, as it has to not be bothered by the lowest impedances.
Personally, if I cannot make a speaker work with most tube amps on the market, or am forced to dig deeply into the pocketbook to own a huge ss amp upstream, this is a MAJOR negative to me with regards to the speaker in question ( whichever speaker that may be). So much so, that I will not entertain this design, regardless of SQ.
Your thoughts?
- ...
- 178 posts total
Dear @daveyf : First than all I'm a MUSIC lover and each single week at least I ttend to enjoy Live MUSIC and this " attitude " I have it for the last 25+ years. I hate to listen the system Hardware and my room/system is builded through several years around nothing less than MUSIC but to enjoy MUSIC in my home we all need some kind of source/hardware. I used tube electronics over 10+ years till I learned.
My ADS L2030 " old " speakers has 95db efficiency, no there is no single design problem with:
The other gentleman ixs totally wrong, maybe he need to talk with J.Curl about that design or learn in other way about that specific design. I really don't care on his post that only shows high ignorance in tha specific regards amps.
R. |
@rauliruegas Which other gentleman are you referring to? I don’t think anyone on this thread is totally wrong…except maybe you, lol😁.
just kidding..😎 |
@daveyf : Yes, maybe me.
@unsound " speakers designers have to choose what paramters and associated compromises combine to best meet ultimate design goals. Some if not most of the best measuring loudpseakers have lower impedances, and ergo lower sensitivity. There are a bountiful number of well designed amps that can handle such loads with minimal consequence. " In total agreement with you.
R.
|
Again Speaker sensitivty alone is not an indicator of quality or sonic virtue in loudspeakers. I can think of other values that might be related to sonic virtue, such as widely varying impedance (in a passive design), high distortion, limited dispersion, inconsistent dispersion across the audio band, etc, etc. High efficiency is simply an engineering choice made, not an evolution. Brad |
- 178 posts total