What makes One Music Server Sound Better than Another?


So this week my Mojo Audio DejaVu music server that I have used for the past 2-3 years crapped out. Benjamin at Mojo was more than helpful and the DejaVu is on its way to Mojo Audio where it will make a full recovery.

Thankfully, I still have my Antipodes DX2 Gen 3 (their former flagship) music server so I hooked it up. After wrestling with Roon protocols, transfers, and set-up menus, I was able to get it going so I have music. The DX and my Sonore Sig Rendu SE opt. are both connected to my network so the DX (like the DejaVu), is only being used as a Roon core and the Sig Rendu SE serves as the Roon endpoint for streaming Tidal and Qobuz, with a direct USB connection to my DAC.

The point of this thread is to ask, how come I perceive the the DejaVu server as sounding better than the Antipdes DX? In fairness, the differences I perceive are not great but it seems the DejaVu is fuller sounding, more tonally rich, and bolder. Is this why some here spend $10K+ on a Grimm, Taiko or something else?

If a server is basically a computer, sending digital information to a streamer/endpoint and, assuming that digital information is transmitted asynchronously and reclocked by the DAC’s master clock, and assuming noise is not the issue (i.e., both units are quiet and there is an optical break between the network and both the server and endpoint) then what are the technical reasons one should sound better than the other? It is not that I want to spend $10K+ on a music server with a lifespan of maybe 5 years before becoming obsolete, but I would like to understand what more you are getting for your money. So far, the best I can come up with is lower internal noise as the major factor.

As a side note to the above, when I thought things looked hopeless for getting set up, I scheduled a support session with Antipodes and, although I lucked into the solution before the meeting time, Mark Cole responded ready to help. Setting up the session was super easy and reminded me of the superior level of support I had come to enjoy from Antipodes during the time that the DX was my primary server, including multiple updates and 2 or 3 hardware upgrades, which prolonged the service life of the DX. Good products and good company.

 

mitch2
Post removed 

One other thing- I remember how good the original Star Trek TV series looked on our new Philco Color TV in 1968- analog over the air broadcast.  The picture, the colors were breathtaking.  Lucky for us those episodes were filmed.  The 4k remaster of Star Trek streamed on my OLED TV finally looks better than it did in 1969.  Wish my mom could see it.  Between 1969 and now?  Grainy over-driven cable TV picture looked terrible.  

I have no opinion on switches except for my own experience owning two Silent Angel Bonn N8 Ethernet Switches.  These are essentially the same as the English Electric 8Switch as both are made by the company ThunderData and use the identical board, with the cases being the main (only?) difference.  In my system, the Bonn N8 switches work great as switches but they make zero discernable sonic difference.

I am however curious how fiber optic transmission of a digital signal could possibly limit dynamics, and also how a silver plated Ethernet cable could possibly affect transmission of a digital signal to the point of audibility.

Fiber is always the best connection possible, much better than usb for sound quality. ‘Fiber's resistance to magnetic interference makes transmissions nearly noise free, and it has the advantage of better signal quality’.

if your Ethernet connection seems noisy to you, then on your last leg to your dac, implement a fiber network conversion in that circuit and it will clear up any noise on the Ethernet connection.