Good measuring DACs vs.


I recently owned and compared a number of DACs in my system and was particularly interested in the sound of two "perfect measuring" DACs, the Mola Mola Tambaqui and the Benchmark DAC3 HGC. With either of those, it seemed every note came out clearly, cleanly, and accurately, without a hint of distortion. Both have been reviewed by Stereophile, and John Atkinson concluded his review measurements with,

"The Mola Mola Tambaqui offers state-of-the-digital-art measured performance. I am not surprised HR liked its sound."

and,

"Benchmark’s DAC3 HGC offers state-of-the-art measured performance. All I can say is "Wow!"

So, why is it that neither of these two objectively perfect DACs seem to emotionally engage me to the same level as my Mojo Audio Mystique EVO Pro, which is an R2R design using (basically antique) AD1862 "Z" chips? How can I not perceive the same levels of body, tone, or dimensionality from two DACs which exhibit "state-of-the-digital-art measured performance" and that really do nothing wrong?

mitch2

Bottom line everyone hears differently. Goes with what sounds best to you not with something someone else tells you should sound good or best (or measures good).

czarivey: A Ferrari will get you a lot more girls than that Ford truck though!

I wasn't aware that rich children were foolish 🤔

@ellajeanelle not here in South Dakota. Girls will look at you and say who is that stupid city boy?

According to some Top Gear show releases, Lambor attracted lots of BOYS while hot-roded Jeep attracted GIRLS so go figure...

Rich children grown to everything "padded" and "softened" can’t be smarter than street rat by all possible means.  

By an insanely wide margin, the worst testing DACs would be those from Audio Note.  The images of waveforms are totally unrecognizable as sine waves.  Find one to audition.  That audition will convince you of the utter meaninglessness of measurements.