@atmasphere : E= mc2 : inherited and learned at different levels.
Taste still is as I explainesd. It's my take and I don't read yet any argument that really " beats " it.
R.
- ...
- 302 posts total
@rooze Actually I was saying exactly that. Distortion of any amplifier is also its sonic signature. Do you know of a musical amplifier? It has a musical distortion signature, likely with prominent 2nd and 3rd harmonics. @rauliruegas Perhaps you could explain how deciBels, which are often called "volume units", are the result of taste rather than human hearing rules. 3dB is a doubling of power in an amplifier, but barely audible as a volume increase, are you saying that is something learned?? |
@atmasphere Ok, got it. I will have to think more on this. Example, I’d considered PRAT a key component of ‘musicality’ but it would never have occurred to me that PRAT could be a function of an amp’s distortion product or signature.
|
Well, one must consider the wide range of distortion possible in the amplifier, indeed the whole chain… it’s mostly dominated by the transducers… and IF you can hear it includes temporal and transient distortion…. While the dna code we all run is very strong… we are not identical… after all there are…some people with perfect pitch….. perhaps a small allowance for the existance of God… Fatigue free PRAT + |
@atmasphere : You insist on the same " technical " terms and yes volume is comething we learned and it's our taste who defines the kind of volume we like.
You just don't understand the whole explanations I posted or just don't want to understand but everything is already said.
Useless and futile to follow this non-fructifer dialogue and before I be less polite with you: bye, bye and Happy year-end Holidays and for the other gentlemans too.
R. |
- 302 posts total