@decathalon1991 I love the accuphase gear. I think Luxman specs in a similar way. Would you agree?
McIntosh to Luxman?
Hey everybody. I need some advice. It's fair to say I've lusted over Luxman equipment for a few years now. Something about Japanese hifi that just gets me. Anyway, one of the online retailers of new and used equipment has a Luxman L-507uX (not the mark ii) for sale. I do really like the sound from my hybrid MA252 integrated, and it drives my Maggie 1.7s with ease. Most of my listening is of the streaming variety (Bludesound Node/Qobuz), and some vinyl (Music Hall MMF-5).
Here's my question: what will the Luxman bring me that the McIntosh isn't providing? More refinement? More authoritative bass? Better soundstaging? If the answer is yes, then I may pull the trigger on the Luxman. By the way, I can get a nice trade-in on my McIntosh, so my out-of-pocket won't be too bad. Please weigh-in if you've had both McIntosh and Luxman gear and what your experience with both brands has been. Thanks in advance! ~ Jerry
- ...
- 76 posts total
You are far above @decathlon1991 , and should not even engage with him. You are a long standing and valued contributor, and he is a lurking troll. Ignore him. |
Back to my assessment of the Luxman... 1. The lady of the house says "Did you get a new stereo?" 😀😀 She thinks it looks really cool. 2. Build quality is top-notch. Dials feel great. Input dial moves from position to position with a nice "thwunk". Very solid. I do with the meters were a tad brighter. 3. I Listened to Coltrane and Hartman last night. Vocals were spot-on. Johnny was in my living room! 4. Bass. As I mentioned in an earlier post, the 1.7s now have bass! Tight and full, but not bloated. Certainly not the type of bass you feel, but bass that has texture and speed. Very cool. 5. Soundstage. In my room, I'm not noticing a bigger or deeper soundstage than the McIntosh. I'll keep listening. That's it for now. I hope the moms in you lives have a wonderful day today! ~ Jerry |
- 76 posts total