JL and Rythmic do bass differently. My complaint about my Rythmic is the lack of punch. Not saying there is none but not like the JL punch you in the gut bass. The Rythmic does blend very well. Personally I would pony up for the JL.
Subwoofers: add a JL Audio or switch to 2 Rythmic subs?
Am considering adding another subwoofer to my main rig. System features Magico A5 speakers and one JL Audio E112 subwoofer in a dedicated 29' by 16' by 10' listening room.
The speakers run full range and the sub runs off the second line output of my Audio Research Reference 5SE preamp. The sub is crossed over at about 40 hz via its own internal low pass crossover.
As is the system produces plenty of bass, which reaches to about 25 hz. The sub is not detectable sonically but it's output in the low bass is a little down compared to mid and upper bass.
I've been contemplating adding another sub to smooth the bass response a little and also add a little output at very low frequencies. I was also thinking about adding bass traps in the front corners behind the speakers, again to aid in low frequency smoothness (room currently untreated).
I'm intrigued and have been reading about the Rythmic subs (12SE). They seem to be highly regarded by users on this site. Additionally, they are available as a pair new for the same cost as one new JL E112.
Not sure if it's worth the trouble to even go down this road and looking for advice.
Thanks!
- ...
- 12 posts total
| Post removed |
For home theater applications, Rythmik Audio offers ported subs, still featuring Brian Ding's patented servo-feedback design. For real bass hounds, he now also has models featuring dual-opposed 12" woofers, dual-opposed 15" woofers, and an 18" woofer. As with all Rythmik models, featuring his servo-feedback design. |
@bdp24 If you try a Swiss Digital Fuse Box on your dual-opposed Rythmiks, your jaw will drop. Bass hounds only 💚 |
- 12 posts total